I largely addressed this proposal in my response to Kris’ comments in the other thread. I think the one General rule is rather silly – if we have competent officers around to run operations, they should be permitted to do so regardless of how many Generals we have. Additionally, the solution to our current workaround of permitting cross-membership only if someone is approved by the General Corps is simply to prohibit cross-membership.
Given that current SPSF policy is to disallow cross-org membership, and has been in place for many moons now, no, I don’t think it will hurt our numbers. Let’s get it in law so we can simplify the process of joining the SPSF.
No. Ever since we required members to prioritize the SPSF alone, our officer corps has actually expanded dramatically in both quality and depth. Plus, we should be prioritizing retaining people who are dedicated to the SPSF, not entertaining the wishes of those who will inevitably put another region or agenda first.
Coming back to that, well, I was thinking about this possibility too and it wouldn’t be difficult to adapt our legislation to this. It is more my preference to differentiate the PM from the Generals Corps, just as I would like them to be differentiated from their Cabinet
Honestly, I’m thinking about removing the change in the Charter, thinking about it a little and I found it a bit contradictory, since the PM can already appoint Ministers to perform tasks delegated to them.
It would just be something more and meaningless.