The primary reason we called the Great Council was to address inactivity among a large portion of our legislator population. Assembly debates usually only have a few participants but many voters. I’m not 100% certain we can resolve this through changing laws, but it highlights a kind of contradiction we’ve built in to our Charter for many years, even before previous rewrites. We tie overall membership in the offsite community to being a member of the legislature, even when (as abundantly evident) many members of the community have no real interest in legislating. That’s what I aim to address here.
Part of this phenomenon is that it’s easy to maintain membership in the legislature without actually being a productive member of it. We tie voting rights and at least part of the identity of being a “TSPer” to Assembly membership, so in order to maximize the franchise we lessen the obligations of being in the legislature. This was the same story when we used citizenship, and it’s the same thing that other regions deal with too.
But this isn’t a mandatory framework we have to use. I’ve been thinking of a way to satisfy all three goals:
- Easy-to-attain enfranchisement for Cabinet and Delegate elections
- Easy-to-attain membership in the legislature
- Meaningful activity and productive participation in the legislature
3 is incompatible with 1 & 2, so long as 1 & 2 are tied together. So we should stop tying them together.
What I’m envisioning is treating the Assembly far more like a real-world legislature. Not in terms of electing people to it, that’s too exclusive for our community. But in the real world, legislatures don’t sit 24/7/365. You don’t need to be a Representative to vote for the President. I’d like us to explore the following framework for citizenship and our legislative branch.
- At the broadest level, we have citizens. Being a citizen grants the right to vote in Cabinet & Delegate elections and optionally join the legislative branch. LegComm would handle citizenship applications the same way we handle legislator apps today.
- Citizens can apply to join the Assembly, provided they accept the requirements of membership. Those requirements are that you actively participate in debates during legislative sessions and vote on the bills that reach the floor.
- The Assembly is transformed from an always-alive body to one that operates under legislative sessions. Any member can motion to begin session, which would require X seconds. Sessions are called for specific reasons. Like our Great Council rules here, the Assembly ends its session once it determines its business is done. Opening a session is advertised, but it’s incumbent on members to ensure they’re paying attention and keeping up to date with the region enough to know what session is open. Sessions would start right away, not waiting a week or whatever for people to show up.
- If a member failed to actively participate and vote in the session, they are removed from the legislature and ineligible to participate in the next session. After that, they can reapply, possibly with some sort of sponsorship requirement (but not married to that). The idea here is that there are consequences for being a non-productive backbencher, but not ones that can’t be overcome.
- The Chair of the Assembly still presides over legislative sessions. Instead of a defined X-month terms, we could do X sessions before a new election is held.
This can be paired with @HumanSanity’s committees idea. This is slightly similar to previous “voter registration” ideas, but in my opinion none of those really addressed how we incentivize meaningful participation. Some just expanded the legislator population by decreasing participation requirements. Others just bypassed the Assembly for voting in elections. The framework above would satisfy all of our goals, instead. We would maintain a broad franchise for executive elections. Meanwhile, we’d have a legislative branch with true participation requirements that’s not also overly punitive for failing to meet them. And we can afford to enforce more real, meaningful participation exactly because membership in the legislature isn’t required to vote in executive branch elections.
By moving to a session-driven structure for the Assembly, it makes the legislature more of an “event” that you can miss out on. My hope here is that FOMO, in addition to the participation requirements to be able to not “miss out”, creates incentive to join the Assembly and participate in it.
Thoughts? I have not worked on any legislative text for this, that will require a major rewrite of portions of the Charter and our laws. But I want to open debate on the framework itself while I work on the legislative drafts.