Omnibus Bill

[ProfessorHenn]

@Pronoun

what you personally want to do.

I’m not introducing a bill I don’t personally agree with.

@Pronoun

After all, what’s the point of establishing a regional government anyway if we don’t want to get involved in what it does?

After a single candidate for Prime Minister, a single candidate for Minister of Culture, three candidates for Minister of Foreign Affairs, and two candidates for Minister of Engagement, with no candidates for Minister of Defense, as well as two OWL Directors that have both resigned, I believe it’s safe to say that there’s a very small number of people that want to get involved in our government we’ve established.

@Pronoun

the whole point of a constitutional convention is to think about the government we want.

I agree. Kringle and I did. This is our idea. If you have different ideas, nobody is stopping you from bringing them up.

@Pronoun

not wanting others to participate in that area of government either.

Where are we restricting the ability of others to participate?

@Pronoun

As we consider our own interests, it’s also important to consider the interests of others in our community.

Who are you considering “others”? Great Council participants who haven’t posted in this thread? Legislators that aren’t Great Council participants (but can still post in this subforum)?