IN THE COURT OF MEDIA, SUBVERSION, SANDWICHES & SHITFUCKERY
Ace v. Konsa, et al.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BASED ON STATUTORY BAR
PER CURIAM.
Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by @CayonNS, asserting ownership of the Hill pursuant to the Special Law II on the King of the Hill Conflict, enacted on January 1, 2025 (Kiritimati Time). Said statute provides inter alia that:
The statute remains in vigore pleno and has neither been repealed abrogato nor declared unconstitutional ipso jure.
Plaintiff @Ace asserts joint ownership with @Konsa, while @ExquisiteGentleman submits amicus curiae that the Hill is a “family hill”. @Ari interpleads “for reasons, and not reasons unspecified”, professing intent to “marry the hill”, which Konsa contests on the ground of a prior matrimonial union with said Hill.
Notwithstanding these baroque submissions, lex specialis derogat legi generali. The Special Law II constitutes a statutory bar ad litem; thus, Ace and the co-claimants lack standing ab initio to pursue title. The arguments of @Szurea purporting to nullify the statute are ultra vires and without effect.
Accordingly, there being no genuine dispute of material fact and the movant being entitled to judgment ex lege, the Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that title to the Hill is vested exclusively in CayonNS, and all other claims are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
SO ORDERED.