Interview with Welly
by Peoples Guerilla Armed Coalition (@xshotss), countryball by Holy Free (@Tin)
Welly is among TSP’s premier gameplayers, serving as the region’s Minister of Foreign Affairs for multiple consecutive terms now, across a number of different administrations. In addition to that, he is a member of the Coral Guard, a High Court Justice, and a recent nominee to the Council on Regional Security, alongside fellow TSP mainstay, Utopia. In the below interview, hosted by Shots/Jay, he discusses a number of exciting recent foreign affairs developments.
Shots/Jay: Hello, Welly! It’s a pleasure to host your interview for this month’s South Seas Gazette issue. A lot of developments have occurred in recent times, but before we start with that, do you mind giving us a short overview of your time on NationStates and the South Pacific and who you are?
Welly: Thanks so much for having me, it’s wonderful to be here!
As you probably know, asking me for “short” answer to anything is a recipe for disaster, but let me take a shot at it. I joined TSP in 2023, and my first year and a half or so were mostly focused on domestic affairs. I’m a law nerd at heart, so I found myself naturally drawn to legislating and litigating. I drafted reforms to most of our major statutes, including the Elections Act, Citizenship Act, Criminal Code, World Assembly Act, and Judiciary Act. And I spent some time arguing cases before the High Court, most significantly the constitutional challenge to the Resolution to Restore Regional Accountability. Along the way, I served as Clerk, Deputy Chair, then Chair of the Assembly.
Over time, my interest shifted towards foreign affairs. I don’t actually recall when, but at some point ProfessorHenn appointed me to our Foreign Affairs Council, which only whet my appetite for greater exposure to that part of the game. Around this time last year, I was appointed Minister of Foreign Affairs, and I have just started my fifth term in that position. I’ve also been appointed to the High Court (probably because they were tired of reading my briefs as a litigant) and to the Coral Guard.
Shots/Jay: Two new members have been admitted into the Aegis defender alliance, Balder and Starlight & Horizon. What do you think this signifies for the alliance? How do you envision it going from now?
Welly: The accession of Starlight & Horizon and Balder were momentous events for the Aegis, and I’m excited about what both regions will bring to the alliance.
As pointed out in the Aegis statement regarding their admission, Starlight’s rise in gameplay has been nothing short of meteoric. They are now one of the most active Defender regions. As such, Starlight is a natural fit in the alliance, and Aegis will benefit immensely from their depth of talent across military, diplomatic, and cultural spheres. From TSP’s perspective, Starlight is one of our most valued friends and allies, and our relationship has only grown since the ratification of the Covenant of Swans and Stars in April. So we are very pleased to have them join our premier multilateral alliance.
Equally significant was the admission of Balder and the corresponding detente between Balder and the Rejected Realms. Balder’s rapprochement with Defender regions actually started with TSP in 2021, when HumanSanity negotiated the Pact of the Center of the Earth, the Balder-TSP non-aggression treaty. In the years since, Balder has been a steadfast ally in the conflict against Raider Unity and developed deep diplomatic and cultural ties with numerous Aegis members. Regrettably, Balder’s relationship with the Rejected Realms remained strained as a result of differences dating back over a decade. Just before Balder’s accession into Aegis, the Balder and TRR governments agreed to a detente and expressed a desire to continue discussions towards closer relations. I welcome this meaningful step towards mending bridges between two of TSP’s oldest friends, and I hope that it heralds an era of greater unity among Defender regions.
Moving forward, I think the alliance would benefit from thinking carefully about opportunities for collaboration outside the military sphere. For example, with the collapse of the Partnership for Sovereignty, there may be an opening for a new Defender-aligned Security Council voting bloc.
Shots/Jay: We’ve opened up two new embassies in recent times, the West Pacific and the Outback. Can you comment on what this means for relations with both regions? Do you think this points to any shift in the South Pacific’s approach to foreign affairs, or is it a simple expanding of affairs?
Welly: I’m incredibly enthusiastic about our expanded relationship with both the West Pacific and the Outback. Frankly, it made little sense that TSP was so diplomatically disengaged from these two regions, both of which are significant powers in numerous aspects of gameplay. There are so many areas in which we can collaborate productively–indeed, we already have, in WA votes and the inaugural GenSec elections, for example–that it benefits both sides to have a consistent, open line of communication between our respective governments. I look forward to seeing how both relationships continue to develop and strengthen in the coming months.
In terms of what these developments suggest about TSP’s approach to foreign affairs more broadly, I think they reflect our commitment to proactive, opportunities-based diplomacy. What do I mean by that? In my view, TSP’s historical foreign policy was overly rigid at times, more concerned with what differentiates us from potential diplomatic partners than what we have in common. Except with our most bitter enemies (i.e., raiders), there are always opportunities for mutually beneficial collaboration with other regions. Even if our interests sometimes diverge, there will be areas of overlap, and it is those points of convergence on which our diplomatic efforts should focus. And to identify those areas of overlap, we’ve got to be willing to talk to regions across the ideological spectrum, even those with whom we have had differences in the past. To be sure, we may still have disagreements in the future, but those disagreements can be more effectively addressed through direct, candid communications than by disengaging. That’s the direction that I’ve attempted to push our foreign policy over the last year–towards greater communication and collaboration.
Shots/Jay: About the Eladria situation, their unification with The League & Concord, and subsequent opening of an embassy with them, what do you think this means for relations between TLC & the South Pacific? On a related note, what’s your approach to working with allies when crises occur?
Welly: Our relations with TL&C&E are as strong as ever. They’ve been exceptional partners in the effort to expand Aegis, and I greatly appreciate Rhaza and Horizon’s productive engagement across a number of issues of mutual concern.
With respect to the Eladria situation, I was disappointed and saddened by the rift in the TL&C community that was caused by Eladria’s founding; its subsequent attempts to poach members of TL&C; and the hostile stance that Eladria adopted towards both TL&C specifically, and, as we now know, the entire Defender establishment more broadly. And I unreservedly condemn Entropan’s decision to invite Unibot into Eladria. Thankfully, through diligent intelligence and diplomatic efforts, that wrongdoing was exposed and those rifts have been healed. I applaud Eladria’s re-integration into the new TL&C&E community, which has become one of the largest and most powerful UCRs as a result, with over 350 endorsements between the three regions. Speaking from TSP’s perspective, it was great to formally open diplomatic relations with Eladria. They have a strong core of promising players, and I hope our respective citizenries find opportunities to interact and grow closer.
To your more general question, I think my approach to working with allies in crises is similar to my overall approach to diplomacy–that direct, clear, and candid negotiations are the best way to resolve fraught situations. As long as the two sides are talking, we can make progress. It’s when one side refuses to engage that relations can break down.
Shots/Jay: Domestically speaking, are there any structural changes to how Foreign Affairs functions behind the scenes (i.e ambassador corps, FAC)? Considering you’ve been MoFA for a while, are there any future plans for the ministry that you’d like to prepare for whoever ends up being MoFA after you, whether that be yourself or someone else?
Welly: This is one of the areas that I’m targeting for improvement in the coming term, working in conjunction with the Prime Minister, FAC, and Utopia in his role as Chief of Staff. While I’m proud to have gotten the Ambassador Corps back up and running after a several-year hiatus, I need to do more to engage with that group and deepen our bench of FA talent. Foreign affairs and gameplay can be a daunting arena for new players to step into, and it’s almost impossible to do well without mentorship and guidance. I benefited immensely (and still do) by learning from some of the best FA minds in the game. Now it’s time to prioritize doing the same for the new members of our FA team, to develop the next generation of FA talent. After all, even Mavs wasn’t MoFA forever!