Supreme Court of the South Pacific

Lampshade Bar and Grill
, , ,
41

Should we abolish the Court?

42

Yes (I was never involved in it)

43

Probably (The process of 1 trial is slow asf)

1 Like
44

Only if your court can take over the four cases (or was it five?)

1 Like
45

4 cr and 1 cc

1 Like
46

cc: @CayonNS

2 Likes
47

Not valid, please put in the required codes and why you are suing… or whatever those are called… I will look at it later if you don’t do it earlier

Estimated time until judgment: 4.5 months

2 Likes
48

4.5 business months

49

I’m here to ask if the Supreme Court could make the Soppocratic Party an official TSP party

1 Like
50

Denied

User banned.

51

I’m suing… drums… the Chief Justice himself @CayonNS for bribing the Election Commissioner to incorrectly put me on the ballot of Craziest Person when I didn’t ask to be. This incident was deeply defamatory and humiliated me in the elections, I need a lawyer NOW!

2 Likes
53

NONSENSE! There were no illegal things I’ve done— I didn’t even bribe the EC! It was just a small gift and it wasn’t even related to xshotss and his candidacy! We were allowed to put people on our ballot even when they don’t actually accept their nomination!

1 Like
54

Greetings. The chief justice would like to inform the people about the following cases:

CR.01

CR.02

CR.03

CR.04

CC.01

Progress on CR.01 and CR.02 will begin in about 24 hours from now. The court knows that Duwa, defendant of CR.01 and plaintiff of CR.02, is unable to participate in any more discussions here in the South Pacific and Hamborn, plaintiff of CR.01 and defendant of CR.02, announced that they will be rarely active for a certain period of time. The court also notes that a prosecutor and lawyer in CR.01 have been banned from the region. Considering the above, the court will judge with only the evidence existing.

As of now, there are no plans on CR.03, CR.04 and CC.01.

The final decision of the court will be posted in this topic, considering how the threads of the individual cases have been locked due to inactivity.

Thank you.

Altnavia Cayo
Chief Justice

55

I Hamborn,

Under thejuridiction gaved to me by the democratic process, I decided that the case CR.03 and CR. 04 will be responded of their accusation before the 2026-05-02T20:00:00Z.

A vote will be held here and under the provided evidances showed by the accusation and defendant defenses. As CR.03 and CR.04 are related. The ones with the most number of Yes will be the official result and the other one declared invalided.

– Hamborn

Legislative things
56
Is CR.03 shows that Tin attempted to make a coup ?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

If you vote yes :

What should Tin endure if Yes win ?
  • Eat Pie
  • Eat Ice Cream
  • Eat Cake
  • Jail (years)
  • jail (months)
  • jail (days)
0 voters

If you voted yes :

How many ?
  • 1
  • 5
  • 10
  • 50
  • 100
  • 500
  • 1000
  • Infinity
0 voters
57
Is Tin made a false accusation ?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

Evidances of CR.03 :
Holy Freean Coup 2026: Into the 2nd dimension (Gaved by Tin)
Evidances of CR.04 :
None

58

Hang on why is there a court if we are gonna do it by vote? No discussions?

Or are the votes something like a jury?

59

Mostly a jury. But still need a validation if you doesn’t the vote is invalid.

60

This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.