New canon rules and various updates

How about this: there could be one event that officially resumes the canon. A NPN announces that it has achieved navigating into the “TT”. They are willing to share the know-how with nations that agree to signing a treaty similar to the Babylon ones, thereby hoping to secure a fair use of the “TT” and hopefully peaceful relations. (This would be the main reference NPN that would be on the more benevolent side, yet powerful.)

RP resumes shortly after this announcement which will be known as the first year ABT. It could develop into a full RP if we want.

3 Likes

That doesn’t work because some nations are drastically changing (RUW), some are being removed (UoE), some are being added (SG)

That can happen, but it can’t happen immediately, and it shouldn’t be the resuming of RPs, we need to work on our own nations

It doesn’t make sense imo that we would start in ABT, with no clear relations whatsoever

2 Likes

Maybe that event could happen late this year, giving us time to get ready?

2 Likes

That’s my suggestion, yeah

3 Likes

Are we going to have a vote on this?

2 Likes

Yeah we most likely should. We should also try to figure out (eventually) how to actually implement the changes and mainly how to act with all of the retconned roleplays.

Like, do we try to make a Roleplay Archive of sorts? Or do we just add [RETCONNED] or something along the lines of that to every title. I personally just know that I don’t want us to delete them, but I also don’t think we should keep them in the same category as the rebooted A1-0 as it could get messy and cofusing for us and especially eventual newcomers.

As for the map-related things though, just know that I’m fully ready to proceed as soon as you guy give me the greenlight (and after I consult and/or work with Qwert and Doge obviously).

2 Likes

I think we should just add [RETCONNED] tags, not everyone is going to end up retconning all their stuff

2 Likes

Here’s an update of the rules according to what has been discussed (new text green). Please vote.

Map

  1. The map shall be updated according to these results: The name A1-0, a possible naming convention and its implications - #99 by Qwert
  2. An activity check shall be carried out
  3. Merging or splitting plots shall not be allowed except for when a player does so within their own plot and when no other nation grows significantly as a result. Minor border changes will still be possible.
  4. Map claims shall provide a general outline of intended lore and stats, see Moderation panel below
  5. A new claim is added on the map once the moderation panel has approved the nation

Stats

  1. Plot sizes (cross-section area and volume) will be calculated and listed. The amount of stars and planets will be listed as well (based on stellar densities etc as previously discussed)
  2. One non-player nation shall be created which will serve as a reference for a medium-high ranked nation
  3. No fixed caps. Consent rules apply; e.g. if a player has their nation attack another player’s nation with 1000 times more ships, the player with the nation under attack is free to assume that those 1000 ships will be of a inferior quality for balancing purposes

Moderation panel

  1. A moderation panel shall be created that will consist of about three volunteers that shall help newcomers by checking the map claim and help guide them to align with the canon. They shall also be consulted when retconning or updating one’s nation
  2. The panel shall be approved by the community

Non-player nations

  1. We keep the large non-player nations where they are, but we rename them and make a new basic lore for them. At least one of them shall serve as a stat reference nation as mentioned above
  2. The small NPNs (aka the Tiyanki ones) are removed and we let the plot be a region that is difficult to traverse and largely unexplored, making it possible to add Tiyanki-style nations in the future should we want.
  3. Any non-player nation and their lore are communal property, no single player shall be able to retcon or remove them

Date system
1. BBT/ABT shall remain as the date system. We will decide later what BT means.
2. The players will have until October 2024 to establish their lore before 0 ABT officially starts
3. One event officially resumes the canon. A NPN announces that it has achieved navigating into the “TT”. They are willing to share the know-how with nations that agree to signing a treaty similar to the Babylon ones, thereby hoping to secure a fair use of the “TT” and hopefully peaceful relations. (This would be the main reference NPN that would be on the more benevolent side, yet powerful.)

Of course, the general community rules still apply: Guide: Getting started in roleplay - TSP Encyclopedia.

Shall the above rules and updates be adopted?
  • Yes
  • No - I want propose amendments to the rules
0 voters
5 Likes

Voting will end July 6. Forgot to add it in the poll.

3 Likes

@im_a_waffle1 I’d recommend getting that ammendment added asap, it may sway the vote more than just “hey, they want to add an ammendment. Lets wait to see what it is.”

1 Like

The vote has ended with 93% in favour; the proposed rules and updates are now in effect. @im_a_waffle1 feel free to post your proposed amendments, the new rules will always be amendable.

Now about the moderation panel, who’d like to be on it?

3 Likes

What would be the responsibilities of the moderators?

Initially this:

  • Since map claims from now on shall provide a general outline of intended lore and stats, the moderation panel shall check and approve them before the player gets their plot (so that they align with the canon)
  • Provide advice on how to make nations align better with the canon
  • They shall also be consulted when retconning or updating one’s nation

But I’m also thinking they might have the main responsibility for the NPNs.

4 Likes

Mh, I see.

Then I volunteer to be a candidate for the moderation panel.

3 Likes

We should also do a confirmation vote once we have two to three volunteers.

3 Likes

Yeah, of course.

I’m not sure if the community will agree to put me in the moderation panel due to past situations, but there’s nothing bad in trying.

2 Likes

I’d be down to be on the moderation panel

3 Likes

I’m willing to be on the panel

3 Likes

I’ll second Flaming and Legend, think they’d be good fits for the panel

2 Likes

I’d also be willing to be on the moderation panel .

2 Likes