Hello, one question.
I am trying to make an official roleplay history for my 34 nations. Currently most of my nations are on a dwarf planet called Taiirasima. Until now, I have always said that Taiirasima is a dwarf planet orbiting the same star as Pacifica. Is that allowed? If not, I can move to another star system. Please reply.
You can try going to TSPRPâs sci-fi canon, A1-0, if you want to roleplay as a sci-fi nation; the category is just below Pacifica.
1 Like
Ok, I am moving to another star system and pretend that I have always been there. Taiirasima and New Altnavia will have separate roleplay stuff
Thankfully, I already made a pretend star system years ago.
And I have read the wiki. So donât worry people, I will make sure I stay at least 4.25 light years away from Pacifica.
1 Like
I would like to mention that this still isnât canon to Pacifica: if you want to play a nation within the stars you should look towards A1-0 as robby said.
3 Likes
Link to NationStates nation in the South Pacific: NationStates | The Republic of Vrigny
Name for your plot: Vrigny
Desired plot: 180
Capital: Adleimen
Location of capital: Next to the coast, with the river going through it.
Customisation:
List of names:
-Adleimen
-Lifov
-Dianxe
-Vraks
-Kollet 3287 m (Mountain)
-Vengril (River)
Already owned plot(s)*: None
I confirm that I have:
read the instructions
the intent to participate in roleplay in the Pacifica canon
made sure that the plot hasnât been claimed by someone else
given each plot I claim a separate name
2 Likes
Hi! Can you please remove Forscova from the map? I really wanted things to work out here, but modern-tech just isnât the type of story I really want to write
1 Like
Link to NationStates nation in the South Pacific*: NationStates | The Federation of New Plant
Name for the plot*: Ravna krayyna (mark it as part of Luzhnychka)
Desired plot*: 217
Capital: RAVNO ZEMLJANSKY Ć TAAD
Location of capital*: On image
Customisation:
Cities:
Ćeverni Begyrgny Ć taad
Begyrgny Ć taad
Ravno Zemaljansky Ć taad
Nova Ravna Krayyna Ć taad
Already owned plot(s): Luzhnychka
I confirm that I have:
read the instructions
the intent to participate in roleplay in the Pacifica canon
made sure that the plot hasnât been claimed by someone else
given each plot I claim a separate name
EDIT: Sorry if I am applying for plots on 2 different accounts I forgot on which I applied for the 1st plot.
1 Like
Name of the plot: Land of the Freeze
Desired plot: 027
Capital: City of the Great Freeze
location of capital: the black dot on image
Other cityâs: will be built throughout rp
I confirm that i have:
read the instructions
the intent to participate in roleplay in the Pacifica canon
made sure that the plot hasnât been claimed by someone else
given each plot I claim a separate name
1 Like
Kia ora,
I failed LordGianniâs activity check, but it looks as though I havenât been removed from the map. I apologize for the absence of any content on my part, my attention was focussed solely on solving my visa situation for the country I immigrated to. Thatâs all wrapped up now and Iâm looking forward to hopefully begin writing again.
Link to NationStates nation in the South Pacific: NationStates | The United Tribes of Petea
Name for your plot: PÄtea
Desired plot: 001
Capital: PĆȘTAPUTAPU
Location of capital:
Customisation: Where HÄhara currently sits on the map.
Already owned plot(s)*: N/A
I confirm that I have:
read the instructions
the intent to participate in roleplay in the Pacifica canon
made sure that the plot hasnât been claimed by someone else
given each plot I claim a separate name
2 Likes
This time it will make sense, though much slower in pace.
Link to NationStates nation in the South Pacific: NationStates | The Exiled Hivemind Colony of BEEstreetz
Name for your plot: Nasphilitae
Desired plot: 034
Capital: SUHAVENSTER
Location of capital: Image
Customisation: /
Already owned plot(s)*: 050 , 051 (activity check removal).
I confirm that I have:
read the instructions
the intent to participate in roleplay in the Pacifica canon (for real now)
made sure that the plot hasnât been claimed by someone else
given each plot I claim a separate name
2 Likes
(Oh my goodness, I really should check in this thread more often!)
Maybe I didnât explain what Iâm trying to do here properly. Sorry about that.
So the thing is, I will put only one of my 30+ nations in the Pacifica Roleplay, and the rest will all go into my own roleplay system.
I will try to follow all the current facts about Pacifica, for example:
-No future tech
-No interactions with other civilizations outside of this planet
-Having my other nations at least 4.25 light years from Pacifica
-Making sure my other nations cannot be seen with the best telescopes on Pacifica
By the way, is it possible to change the nation which the plots are connected to and not lose them? The nation is in TSP
1 Like
TSPRP is completely disconnected from NS; you donât even have to roleplay as a NS nation (I am Ikaranara, Losavra and Past. The latter two do not exist on NS.)
1 Like
You do, however, need to have residency in TSP to rp in Pacifica (but thatâs not required for A1-0 or Aurora). That doesnât mean that your Pacifica rp needs to be based on any preexisting rps you have
1 Like
Iâll be retiring from Pacifica, due to IRL ambitions and time constraints. Sadly, RPing has felt more like a burden the past few months. In addition, I believe IRL constraints have become quite visible in my unsuccessful mandate as Minister of Roleplay which I hope will have a brighter future.
As such, this leaves many open-ended venues about Stoinia. Will it be reduced to just one plot? Or just Stoinia & Carraca? I leave this to you the community. Sallodesia I will grant guardianship to Izaakia the way Ezervulge & Ubesii have been watched over alongside the current RP moderators. Stoinia I leave to the current RP moderators in terms of guardianship, however due to the mixed history through both worldbuilding & monarchy, I allow the community at large to expand Stoinia in its current image as a de facto Spaninol Empire should the community wish it. Depending on the needs of the community you may add to Stoinia or in some cases strip unfinished history parts such as the Marsh Wars. If this proves problematic, Stoinia may be retconned to whatever the community wishes its status to be. I leave its legacy in the palm of your hands.
However⊠No parts of Stoinian history in scope or detail, may be used for Project Nasphilitae as can be deduced from my vote on the matter.
I hope Iâve been a worthy RPer to the canon, but itâs time to burn this bridge and focus on my IRL ambitions.
âSit nomine digna!
Lament of Maverick
âGrown past the endless tides of the Ocean,
âGarbled by lifeâs ongoing commotion,
âGreater desires now call me away.
âGlamour will beseech the Kingâs return,
âGathering around the gilded beret.
âNo longer adorned like in my prime,
âGone are my tales through the echoes of time.
9 Likes
Link to NationStates nation in the South Pacific: NationStates | The Sultanate of Fatiniyah
Name for your plot: Al-Youmna (part of Fatiniyya)
Desired plot: 213
Capital: Iskandariyya
Location of capital: on the part of the river touching the Mediterranean
Customisation:
Ridalla, on the point where the two rivers meet
Al-Tusiya, on the edge of the river near Adanara
Already owned plot(s)*: Fatiniyya
I confirm that I have:
read the instructions
the intent to participate in roleplay in the Pacifica canon
made sure that the plot hasnât been claimed by someone else
given each plot I claim a separate name
(Mark with X)
Done!
Do I understand you correctly, that Altnavia therefore can be removed, because you shift your focus over to the A1-0 canon?
Added, however I couldnât fit two of the four cities.
Also a question: I know, that a âkraiâ/âkrayyâ/etc. is just an administrative division. Does the same apply whenever you write âĆ taadâ and itâs not part of the city name, but just signifies, itâs a city? Because if so, I might be able to fit a little moreâŠ
I mean, you could just use the search function here, but the other account you used was @Novi_Plant.
Iâd advise you strongly to use that original account, except you have a very good reason to not use it, since I cannot keep an overview over alternative accounts when doing activity checks.
Since you did not provide a NationStates nation, have not used the checkmarks confirming you understood our rules and instructions and also due to the name(s) being provided being too meme-y to me, I reject your application. You are allowed to resubmit an application, but please pay attention to the pointed out flaws and make sure you understand our rules and instructions on plot ownership.
Youâre in luck for the on-going permanence discussions. I understand your IRL situation and welcome you back in our rp! Iâd advise to post something rp-related in the near future still, just so we made sure, Petea wonât fall into the category of possibly removable nations in the next Activity Check.
I edited the capital according to your wish, although hoping you have an explanation for that name ^^
As I said on Discord, thatâs sad to hear and you will be missed. I hope that you will come back someday, but as you already figured out in your poem, the final goodbye will be treated as such for the time being.
As for your wishes: We havenât decided yet on this yearâs addtions and removals for the permanent nations. I am aware that there is e.g. @RobbyTheSealâs suggestion to keep your nations around and use them in the future. We already discussed that too, but as I said, we havenât figured out all details and likely wonât until January.
Provided your nation(s) will stay around, we will try to grant your guardianship wishes, but please understand that we will need to check on a case-by-case basis, whether this could circumvent or is circumventing our Four-Plot-Rule currently in place. One decision I will take for you right now, is the cancellation of the PSC 2023, which should be in line with your guardianship wishes.
As for your wish to not be used in Project Nasphilitae: I donât think, you have to worry about that, but we will keep an eye out, that nothing happens to your nation(s).
As a general message to the community: We roleplay moderators - as promised - will come back to you with our decisions, the community can build upon as soon as we are able to.
6 Likes
Hello. I am sorry for breaking the rules regarding this thread but I feel obligated to be clearl and fully explicit on complying with Mavericks wishes. For this reason, I will use summaries, as to not over-crowd this thread. Iâve already bookmarked and liked your reply a few days ago, with intent to imply that I will comply with your wishes, for two additional reasons, other than the already known 0th-being the baseline rule of consent.
OOC: Understandable conclusion.
While Iâm sorry you feel that way, itâs a perfectly understandable conclusion to reach, given prior interactions. Regarding the topic at hand;
Reason I: Not pre-planned, explicit in the OOC thread, implied in the IC thread.
First of which has already been stated here: âImportantly, Nasphilitae isnât envisioned to have been in any confrontations, unless those of the Austral Empire, when the community decides to expand its lore, as its former colony.â; As well as âHistory: Brief, a lot of events will over time get their own RP threads, most open to or requiring other playersâ.
While your nations have had confrontations with the AE, IC Nasphiliti History purposefully avoids mentioning any details. Even if the community wishes to expand AE lore with your creations, I will still honor your wishes and devise (with others) a contingent mechanism-reasoning as for why Nasphilitae itself had not been involved.
Reason II: Personal ethical principle-imperative.
Henceforth the second: Without needless OOC affect, I respect all efforts all people put in their creations of whichever nature, as an ethical principle. Subsequently, itâs imperative that I do not disrespect the creators wishes, in terms of using (in whichever way) their content.
So, yes, you need not worry of that. The two reasons, amplified by Giannis statement that the community will (as it should) be vigilant of this occurring, I hope offer you serenity - regarding this topic.
Thank you for reading and best wishes.
4 Likes
I am sincerely sorry about what I am about to ask from you.
Takahi was initially a joint project with Mav, a Dominion of Stoinia, which means for it to fulfill its RP role Stoiniaâs RP role needs to be fulfilled as well. As it is not the case, as Mav has left RP as of now, I would like to ask the withdrawal of Takahi. Once again, I am sorry for this request.
No, I mean that I will keep on doing my Pacifica Roleplay, but I will have another Roleplay system for my puppet nations, not interacting at all with Pacifica.
Your other roleplay system isnât canon to the canon of Pacifica; Pacifica as a canon is completely divorced from everything else.
2 Likes