IaN - OPAL

Pacifica
, , ,
25

Urgent Regulation regarding Broadband storms (Dec 07 2024)

→ Requested by the Prosecutor for Critical Infrastructure and Telecommunications. Accepted by the Lord Chancellory with “URGENCY” attribute; forwarded to The National Parliament and HM Government. The HM Government validated the request, each citing different reasons.
----> The Plenary Committee issued an “irregular Agenda Session” for The National Parliament. The Head of Government suggested Draft I for meeting the Requests goals. The HM Shadow Government voted in favour of Draft I. The Upper House of Localities forwarded a modified Draft I with technical corrections.
----> Draft II was enacted on December 07th, enforced immediately upon receiving approval from the HM Governments Head of State, which it had. Certain clauses are to be enforced as of December 10th.

The following documentation is not the original text, rather a plain language dispositive, as the Regulation itself envisions be made available through OPAL/IAN under the FPALS License. It is provided by Ayala Moran. Morans own comments (appear like this) in the document.

Quick Access of dispositive contents

I: The NUSP Task Force
II: Imperatives on Mitigation
III: The RFC and OPAL-IAN Directives
IV: Outside Communications Rules and Regulations
V: Rules and Regulations on the RAFI, Lumen, ~?RANDICE?~, and NUS AE

I: NUSP Task Force

1: This regulation approves the initial request of the Prosecutor for Crtical Infrastructure and Telecommunications, for a Task Force to be formed.

2: The Task Force functions xor duties are to:

  • Devise technical errata for absolute inefficiency of a broadband storm to occur;
  • Form an informational service, which is to display relevant information on the Joint Service Top Level Domain, available under the DFPAS (public international access) License;
  • Suggest mitigation measures until the exploit is fully mitigated as in unusable, and forward them to: The Lord Chancellory, The Supreme Court, The National Parliament (including Head of Government and Shadow Government), the HM Cabinet or only to the Head of HM Cabinet that is the Head of State upon own discretion of confidentiality.
  • Suggestions of the above, require approval from only two the composite thirteen entities comprising these institutions, upon which they are to be enforced immediately.

3: The Task Forces technical Errata is to devise an expanded protocol, which would unify but logically segment all currently active Protocols, as an addition to TCP/ACISPv4; hereby termed The NUSP or New Unified Systemic Protocol.

4: The Task Force ought to assess The STAR Protocol, whose moratorium had ended this year. The NUSP Task Force may modify it for additional functionality xor security but must document these changes. If the STAR Protocol is positively re-assessed either in its original ormodified form, it MUST be included into the above mentioned expanded protocol as well.

5: The NUSP Task Force must be composed of qualified experts, sortitioned in the field category of Systems Theory, whether expertised in academia or industry.

6: The NUSP Task Force is held accountable by the Judiciary branch.

II: Imperatives on Mitigation

1: This regulation obliges the immediate release of the four detainees at Clayinn on reason that digital forensics of their data or device memory are incompatible with the event of broadband storms.

2: Hereby the legislation imperatively and absolutely prohibits the availability of Bluetooth by remotely disabling domestic infrastructural support for it and permanently securing that any unauthorised re-activation of its support is highly unlikely to succeed.

3: Demands and permits the General Prosecutor to investigate remaining traces; By memory persistence xor Use of a Bluetooth-exclusive feature xor Examination ofcached traversal utilising Bluetooths Protocol Stack; As these will be remaining anomalies.

4: Obliges all service, server, platform, communications, cellular, radio, satellite, GSM, and signal providers to create: Multi-layer back-ups xor Failsafe solutions; With deadline oftheir ncorporation set on December 10th. Failure tomeet these requirements will result in: TLD firewalling ofthe provider and litigation ofthe accounntable official.

III: The RFC and OPAL-IAN Directives

1: The NUSPTF Joint Service documentation, hereby termed the Reporting Facultative Commission (RFC), is to provide information which the NUSPTF deems necessary or useful for the general public.

2: The RFC is obliged with the following tasks:

  • Elect among themselves the Chief Author, which is supervised by the NUSPTF selected Revision Author;
  • Provide information in a technical manner regarding the following topics:

3: The RFC reports to the General Prosecutor and is held accountable by the Lord Chancellory.

4: Staff of the RFC are to be provided by all entities licensed under the GPALv3.

5: OPAL is instructed to, henceforth, make available all literature within the Systems Theory category, which is older than 5 years sinnce publication.

6: The IaN is obligated in providing assistance to the RFC in the form of transcriptions of the RFC docuentation, in plain tongue, intended to be comprehensible by the general public.

IV: Outside Communications Rules and Regulations

1: All domestic domains are requird to use local and TLD’s firewalls. Motification of the TLD’s firewall is prohibited and sanctionable as a felony. Deadline for implementation is December 10th.

2: All domestic domains are to use only port filtering and geoblocking as defensive measures. The former as to accounnt for obsolete but frequent outside-Nasphilitae use of DHCP. The latter is to be used in cases where the domain is obviously solely intended for local xor regional audiences.

3: ALL users accessing domains outide of TLD’s RIR are obligated to:

  • Ensure the disablement of dynamic web page code including scripting;
  • Regularly delete session tracking (including analytics toolsets and cookies);
  • Enable I2P bridge tunnelling;
  • Obfuscate their user agent string;
  • Daily delete all locally stored caches;
  • Use a proxy service provided by domestic suppliers or the state itself;
  • Use a DNS provider of domestic suppliers or the state itself;
  • Access only three web pages of the same domain simultaneously (only 3 tabs of the same site are allowed);
  • Disable active access to more than three subdomains nand of domains hosted on different websites (same as above, "subdomains" are pages of a website);
  • The tools for automating these tasks will be provided by domestic companies free of charge until the NUSP Task Force completes their duties; As will they be provided by the state itself (do note that NUS OS XX or NUS AE rather already does all of these).

V: Rules and Regulations on the RAFI, Lumen, ~?RANDICE?~, and NUS AE

1: The RAFI is exempt from all above rules.

2: The RAFI must be reported by Lumen until the NUSPTF completes their duties.

3: The RAFI reported will receive additional security architectures and toolsets by the HM Government.

4: The RAFI reporters contractual agreement remains unchanged with Lumen.

5: In the case of the default RAFI reporters unavailability, Lumen is to be temporarily substituted by ~?RANDICE?~ xor NUS AE.

6: If the RAFI reporter is substituted by ~?RANDICE?~ xor NUS AE, new contractual agreements must be made to ensure safety of nationally confidential security.

7: In its current form, NUS AE is exempt from limitations in this legislation; Reasoning for this is its design.

8: The design of NUS AE is prohibited from being: Explained xor Examined xor Accessed xor Read xor Modified; By any parties, internal (within Nasphilitaes TLD) or external, including users of the NUS OS XX (this is impossible to enforce but sure) or PrototAutomaton.