Constitution II of the South Pacific

Article 1954: In accordance with Article 1953, Legionaria is now Sop and Po and can’t be put back together.

Article 1955: Declares Köln being Sop’s captial and Dresden being Po’s capital
The following regions will be split from Ex-Soppo
Baravia
Saxony
Würzburg
Saarbürken
Frankfurt am Main
Bremen
Hamburg

Alsace-Lorraine is returned to France, the Memel Terrority is returned to The Lithuanian SSR and the city of Gdańsk (AKA Danzig) is annexed by The Polish People’s Republic

Ex-Soppo will have to pay for $790,000,000,000,000 in damages and they cannot have loans from other nations to pay
The new economy will be in Anti-Gay Duwa Dollars and the old currency will be banned from circulation

No nation may recognise Soppo as a whole and Ex-Soppo will be divided forever

-The order of His Highness the Emperor

1 Like

Article 1956: Every article relating to Legionaria is hereby repealed, as they have no place messing with my country without either my consent or my knowledge. If Legionaria were to split, it’d most likely be between Soppocracy and the Rossartrists. This is an unprecedented move to use MY country for things I don’t want it to be used in.

2 Likes

Article 1957: sputnik.

2 Likes

Article 1958:

Repeals Article 1956
Soppo will be forever spilt
Reinacts all repealed articles

Article 1959: Explorer 6

1 Like

Article 1960: Article 1958 is repealed for these reasons:

1: I never consented to the use of my country for any purposes whatsoever.

  1. Legionarians historically have rarely ever wanted to split after the 2nd Unification War (basically our Civil War) due to their sense of nationalism and love for their homeland.
1 Like

Articles 1961: Vostok 1. Let’s go!

2 Likes

Article 1962 :
clause 1 :
Precision on article 1898.

clause 2 :After the referendum of Article 1898 succeed, The Article 1960 of @ExquisiteGentleman have 3 days to rectify his article.

and

You have now 3 days to rectify your article or render it null. This article have no legal issue for these 3 days.

Article 1963: @CayonNS officially requests @Hamborn to answer to this question.

What does it mean exactly that Article 1960 by @ExquisiteGentleman should be rectified or declared null? This law newly made by you only applies to articles that have been repealed. Article 1960 has never been repealed yet. It does not apply to Article 1958 either, as it was not repealed according to the clauses you mentioned.

@Hamborn must reply within 72 hours.

Article 1964 :

Clause 1 : Amendement of article 1962 :


clause 1 :
Precision on article 1898.

Clause 2 : Hereby repeal Article 1960, Because of Article 1612.

clause 23:After the referendum of Article 1898 succeed, The Article 1960 of @ExquisiteGentleman have 3 days to rectify his article.

and

You have now 3 days to rectify your article or render it null. This article have no legal issue for these 3 days.


Clause 2 : Article 1963 of @CayonNS : The 72h response argument is unconstitutional : Article 1962, is in rule with Article 1898.

1 Like

Article 1965:

Cayo would like to note that we all have the right to request an answer to a question, and that cannot be considered unconstitutional. The question was asked due to Article 1962 at the time not making perfect sense, as stated in Article 1964.

Cayo would also like to question the newly adopted amendment of Article 1962, about why Article 1960 must be seen as not in the interest of the majority. However since it is hard to determine whether or not that is true, the amendment is not unreasonable. Cayo did notice that Duwa and Tin both agreed on splitting The Legionarian Isles as opposed to only ExquisiteGentleman against it, which could make ExquisiteGentleman’s argument to be seen as ‘not be in the interest of the majority’ to some.

Cayo would like to officially announce his support for @ExquisiteGentleman in this argument, as it is true that some players are playing with his nation without his consent, and that cannot be accepted as a good thing.

Cayo shall open a poll lasting for 48 hours to see how many people would support ExquisiteGentleman in this situation.

Should Players Other Than ExquisiteGentleman Be Allowed To Manipulate The Legionarian Isles Without The Owner’s Consent?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
1 Like

Article 1966: Manipulation of other players’ countries is hereby forbidden, unless given explicit permission by the nation’s owner/operator.

1 Like

@CayonNS, Voting is own poll is a rig

What do you mean we always vote on our own polls don’t we??

Article 1967 : The two last post is need to be supress :

Article 1848 says that non article post is illegal.

1 Like

article 1968:
Article 1967 is suppressed because I said so

Article 1969: Article 1968 is repealed as it does not provide proper reasoning for the action.

Article 1970: The repeal of any Article of this Constitution shall be deemed complete, conclusive, and irrevocable, and shall not, by reason of implication, inference, or construction, operate to restore or revive the provisions so repealed. Thus, and for the avoidance of all doubt, where an Article is enacted for the purpose of repealing a prior Article, and a subsequent Article is thereafter enacted repealing the repealing Article, such subsequent repeal shall neither revive, reestablish, nor confer renewed force or effect upon the Article originally repealed, but the same shall remain abrogated as if no such subsequent repeal had been adopted.

Article 1971: Thus, Article 1970 is repealed.

1 Like