Article 1955: Declares Köln being Sop’s captial and Dresden being Po’s capital
The following regions will be split from Ex-Soppo
Baravia
Saxony
Würzburg
Saarbürken
Frankfurt am Main
Bremen
Hamburg
Alsace-Lorraine is returned to France, the Memel Terrority is returned to The Lithuanian SSR and the city of Gdańsk (AKA Danzig) is annexed by The Polish People’s Republic
Ex-Soppo will have to pay for $790,000,000,000,000 in damages and they cannot have loans from other nations to pay
The new economy will be in Anti-Gay Duwa Dollars and the old currency will be banned from circulation
No nation may recognise Soppo as a whole and Ex-Soppo will be divided forever
Article 1956: Every article relating to Legionaria is hereby repealed, as they have no place messing with my country without either my consent or my knowledge. If Legionaria were to split, it’d most likely be between Soppocracy and the Rossartrists. This is an unprecedented move to use MY country for things I don’t want it to be used in.
Article 1960: Article 1958 is repealed for these reasons:
1: I never consented to the use of my country for any purposes whatsoever.
Legionarians historically have rarely ever wanted to split after the 2nd Unification War (basically our Civil War) due to their sense of nationalism and love for their homeland.
Article 1963: @CayonNS officially requests @Hamborn to answer to this question.
What does it mean exactly that Article 1960 by @ExquisiteGentleman should be rectified or declared null? This law newly made by you only applies to articles that have been repealed. Article 1960 has never been repealed yet. It does not apply to Article 1958 either, as it was not repealed according to the clauses you mentioned.
Cayo would like to note that we all have the right to request an answer to a question, and that cannot be considered unconstitutional. The question was asked due to Article 1962 at the time not making perfect sense, as stated in Article 1964.
Cayo would also like to question the newly adopted amendment of Article 1962, about why Article 1960 must be seen as not in the interest of the majority. However since it is hard to determine whether or not that is true, the amendment is not unreasonable. Cayo did notice that Duwa and Tin both agreed on splitting The Legionarian Isles as opposed to only ExquisiteGentleman against it, which could make ExquisiteGentleman’s argument to be seen as ‘not be in the interest of the majority’ to some.
Cayo would like to officially announce his support for @ExquisiteGentleman in this argument, as it is true that some players are playing with his nation without his consent, and that cannot be accepted as a good thing.
Cayo shall open a poll lasting for 48 hours to see how many people would support ExquisiteGentleman in this situation.
Should Players Other Than ExquisiteGentleman Be Allowed To Manipulate The Legionarian Isles Without The Owner’s Consent?
Article 1970: The repeal of any Article of this Constitution shall be deemed complete, conclusive, and irrevocable, and shall not, by reason of implication, inference, or construction, operate to restore or revive the provisions so repealed. Thus, and for the avoidance of all doubt, where an Article is enacted for the purpose of repealing a prior Article, and a subsequent Article is thereafter enacted repealing the repealing Article, such subsequent repeal shall neither revive, reestablish, nor confer renewed force or effect upon the Article originally repealed, but the same shall remain abrogated as if no such subsequent repeal had been adopted.