Constitution II of the South Pacific

[CayonNS]

Article 1811:

I.
This part of Articles 1616 and 1619 is amended:

Lastly, Any other the first time any citizen or legislator, no matter their position, attempts by any citizen or legislator, no matter their position, at introducing to introduce an irremovable or unamendable article will lead to them being warned and suspended from writing a new article for three days. If such an action is repeated by the same person, they shall be being unrecognized as a contributor to the Constitution II of the South Pacific. Any articles published by them in the past and in the future will be repealed with immediate haste and they shall not be furthermore recognized. @CayonNs shall not suffer these consequences now because this was not explicitly stated before.

@Franz .

II.

@Silva

Article 1792: The South Pacific Secret Police shall have the power to break up protests in favor of pie or ice cream and punish the respective protesters.

@ExquisiteGentleman

Article 1793: Article 1792 needs to be more tyrannical.

@Flaming

Article 1794: Non-cakeists are allowed to own weapons, including military equipment like drones, tanks, military aircraft, IFVs, missiles, etc. This is to encourage them to overthrow the Cakeists with violent revolution. Cakeists are not allowed to own weapons and must rely solely on praying to Griffindor.

Articles 1792, 1793 and 1794 shall be repealed according to clauses in Article 1621 as they encourage violence and revolutionary tendencies. Article 1794 also limits the rights of citizens and legislators supporting certain desserts.

III.

@Erstavik

Article 1795: Notwithstanding any other provision of law, neither Article 1794 nor this Article shall be repealed, amended, or otherwise abrogated.

Article 1795 is made invalid according to Article 1619 as it attempted to introduce permanent articles. According to the newly amended Article 1619 (written above), @Erstavik shall be warned and suspended from writing new articles for three days starting from the posting of this article.

Please note that the only permanent articles are Article 1619, Article 1621 and the articles that have three or more likes according to current law.

IV.

@ExquisiteGentleman

Article 1795: Pieists are poopy heads

Article 1795 by @ExquisiteGentleman shall be renamed to Article 1796 and then repealed as it is in violation of Article 1612. Such an opinion is most likely not in the interest of the majority.

V.

@ExquisiteGentleman

Article 1798: Repeal all articles meant to oppress or overthrow Cake.

Article 1798 is repealed as it does not obey this part of Article 1621:

In all cases, adequate evidence or reasoning must be provided to justify the grounds of repulsion.

VI.

@UnitedDisneyStates

Article 1799: Article 1791 will be overturned and deemed unconstitutional to the democracy of the South Pacific. Instead Disney, Comcast, and Paramount will all have a say in who wins.

Article 1799 is to be repealed, meaning that Article 1791 is to be made valid again and Article 1790 invalid again. It does not provide adequate reasoning or evidence about why Article 1791 must be overturned.

VII.
Lastly, Cayo condemns UnitedDisneyStates, ExquisiteGentleman, Erstavik, Flaming and Silva for their articles listed above.