Earlier today, the Council on Regional Security voted 3-1 to block @Feux’s citizenship application. Per Article 2.(1).c of the Citizenship Act, the Council considers them to be a significant risk to regional security, and thus deems them ineligible for citizenship.
For the Council on Regional Security,
Sporaltryus
Thank you to the Council on Regional Security for taking action on this.
May I ask: why did it take so long to handle Feux’s citizenship application? Was Feux’s application under review before being accepted? What was the delay on handling it? From my point of view, someone who was condemned by the Security Council for voter importation and multiple attempted coups of a GCR, followed by then creating an alt account to rise in the ranks of that same GCR all over again, should be an easy reject. Is there some kind of nuance I’m missing here?
Ohai. I, a concerned member of the public, have asked a question.
Yes and no. A member of CitComm reviews every application. The CRS doesn’t directly review applications — in this case we made a determination, under Citizenship Act 2(1)c, that the applicant (not the application) was a significant risk to regional security.
We had some ongoing discussion with CitComm, and it hasn’t been uncommon for CitComm to pause application review during elections since applicants accepted in that timeframe wouldn’t be able to vote in those elections.
Citizenship applications are now handled by individual CitComm members (with some asterisks). In this case, we had some miscommunications which we’ll aim to improve moving forward, but that’s what caused the ‘nuance’ of two different determinations.