Greetings to the Assembly.
I am appointing @Erstavik as Director of the Office of World Assembly Legislation. They will post their agenda shortly.
5 Likes
Distinguished Members of the Assembly:
I am deeply honored to have been appointed by the Prime Minister to serve as the next Director of the Office of World Assembly Legislation and I wish to express my profound gratitude for this opportunity. I would also like to express my sincere gratitude to the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Lordnwahs, for his generous mentorship over the past few months, during which he provided invaluable insight into both the operational workings of OWL and the broader landscape of WA politics. Lordnwahs has done a tremendous job as OWL Director and I am well aware that I have very big shoes to fill.
OWL AGENDA
The past few months have been eventful in the WA, particularly in the GA, with the recent departure of the entire GenSec and the Sovereign Seven actively advancing their agenda. As one of the largest GCRs with a highly endorsed Delegate, we hold significant influence in the WA. I want us to use that influence not only to help shape the future of the WA and legislation in a way that reflects the values and interests of our region, but also to ensure the contributions of South Pacificans to NS are recognized.
I intend to continue the excellent work Lordnwahs has done in leading OWL. Additionally, I want to focus on increasing participation in our OWL voting and discussions, as well as encouraging more nations to get involved in drafting and passing their own GA and SC resolutions with the support of a think tank.
Increasing the number of nations actively involved in OWL
Participation in OWL voting and discussions has increased slightly over the past few months. However, only about 10 to 15 nations regularly take part in OWL votes, and discussions around proposals are often limited. For context, over 150 TSP nations voted in the last General Assembly resolution. This means that a relatively small number of voices are having a significant impact on how we instruct our Delegate to vote. Our method of organizing the Delegate’s vote in the WA is fundamentally democratic. Unless the Prime Minister issues specific instructions for security or diplomatic reasons, the Delegate follows the outcome of OWL votes, open to all South Pacificans with a nation in the WA. That is why it is essential to broaden participation in OWL, to give greater legitimacy and representative weight to the recommendations we give our Delegate.
I believe our current OWL setup on Discord is strong, but I am concerned that it is somewhat hidden. Many nations may not fully understand how our WA voting recommendations are made, I myself was not aware for quite some time. To help address this I plan to lead outreach efforts to nations gameside both through the RMB and by telegram, in order to raise awareness of OWL and hopefully bring in more nations to actively participate. I also plan to use dispatches to give nations the option to sign up for pings when new resolutions are open for discussion and voting.
A middle ground GA policy
Recently, we have witnessed the rise of the national sovereigntist movement within the GA, with the announced treaty between the Sovereign Six (Seven) earlier this year. Initially, I found myself in broad agreement with many of their concerns. In recent times, a number of GA resolutions have been both overly niche and arguably frivolous, addressing matters better left to individual member states through national legislation. I am generally a proponent of the principle of subsidiarity, meaning in this context, that decisions should be made at the national or regional level whenever possible. International or supranational bodies such as the GA should intervene only when the objectives in question cannot be effectively achieved by individual nations or regions alone, and always with due respect for national sovereignty, individuals, and the pursuit of the common good.
At the same time, however, the GA has entered what could fairly be described as a repeal frenzy. Numerous important resolutions where the GA was indeed the appropriate legislative authority have been repealed. While I believe TSP should remain vigilant against the excesses of international federalism, we must also resist the blanket dismantling of the GA driven by the sovereigntists. As OWL Director, I will advocate for TSP to support replacements for some of these recent repeals and to back resolutions appropriate for the GA, while continuing to oppose those better left to member states to decide.
Pushing for GenSec to be reinstated
Following the recent debacle with Separatist Peoples and the departure of the entire GenSec, the situation in the GA has been chaotic to say the least. Currently, resolutions are being reviewed by moderators with far less experience than the former GenSec members. These moderators have also taken it upon themselves to dismantle some of the precedents and rules established by the GenSec. I am deeply concerned about the implications this could have not only for the GA but for NS as a whole. This game is community driven and moderators undoing the work of dedicated users is, in my opinion, highly detrimental. My hope is that TSP will adopt a policy supporting the reinstatement of a community driven GenSec preferably allowing its former members to return, but even new nations would be preferable to moderators running the GA.
Pursuing commendations for deserving South Pacificans
I am a little saddened by the fact that it has been quite some time since a South Pacifican was commended by the SC. In contrast, in recent months, we have seen several commendations of prominent members of other GCRs. That is why one of my main goals as OWL Director will be to work together with other nations on drafting commendation resolutions for deserving South Pacificans. Our community includes several nations whose contributions, both within TSP and across the wider game, are significant and who are more than worthy of recognition. My first priority will be to seek commendations for Amerion, and subsequently for Concrete Slab and Professor Henn. I plan to begin this project soon, ideally with the support of the think tank, bringing me to my next point:
Announcing The Lampshade Foundation
Drafting and passing GA and SC resolutions is, unfortunately, an area where TSP has been largely absent in recent times. Currently, a small number of nations from other regions are responsible for the majority of passed resolutions, and the GA, with its complex rules, can present a high barrier to entry. To help more South Pacificans engage in WA affairs and succeed in getting their own resolutions passed, I am establishing a TSP think tank, which I have named The Lampshade Foundation. Based here on the forum, I envision the think tank as a collaborative space where we can develop ideas together and support one another in authoring both GA and SC resolutions. By creating an encouraging and welcoming environment, I hope to empower more South Pacificans to take the leap into resolution writing, and to produce strong and well written proposals to submit to the WA.
Those are the main priorities of my OWL agenda so far. I am always open to suggestions and new ideas on how we can continue to improve and strengthen OWL. As always, making TSP the best it can be is a team effort, and I am truly excited to work with all of you as we shape OWL’s future together.
With unwavering loyalty and admiration to all and everyone in the South Pacific,
EMPEROR LUKE (ERSTAVIK)
7 Likes
Under what authority would the OWL director implement an agenda involving setting “GA policy”?
(OOC: I personally am not inclined to play in-character politics over the current situation and to me that includes ‘official’ policies of the Coalition, an in-character government.)
Thank you for your questions!
To the extent that I have a role in setting GA policy, I can only advocate for us to move in a certain direction. As you know, OWL recommendations are determined by a democratic vote, unless the Prime Minister issues specific instructions for security or diplomatic reasons. I will, of course, honor and support the will of our citizens/WA residents, whichever direction they choose to take. As a matter of law, I am appointed by and serve at the Prime Minister’s pleasure, and they have asked me to include a GA policy.
I understand your position, but GenSec is an area where OOC and IC matters intersect. While the decision to have a GenSec is certainly an OOC admin issue, the GenSec’s rules and the recent changes made by moderators, have a direct impact on the IC dynamics of the GA. For that reason, I believe it is reasonable for us to advocate for the reinstatement of GenSec.
That’s interesting.
Could the Prime Minister share if they intend on setting GA policy through OWL? If so, I have two questions that immediately come to mind:
- To what extent is the Minister of Foreign Affairs involved in these discussions?
- Why avoid Assembly confirmation for an official who will be involved in policymaking?
(OOC: I don’t see how this is different from any other part of the game, where changes to the rules can affect changes to gameplay. That seems par for the course with any game. It doesn’t change the fact that I personally have no interest in litigating serious OOC administration issues through the lens of IC politics.)
Congrats bro
1 Like
This was an unintentional error on my part as I did not review the law in depth before this appointment. Many things have taken my attention recently outside of NS.
Consider this my formal appointment of Erstavik to Cabinet, as OWL Director. I will be adding them to the Foreign Affairs Council as an advisor in the meanwhile.