Heliseum for Prime Minister!

Heliseum for Prime Minister

It is an honor to present myself to you as a candidate for Prime Minister. I look forward to speaking with y’all about this campaign and its implications for TSP. On top of answering questions here, I will be doing my best to be present in VC each evening of the election period.

People: A Guiding Principle

The Coalition’s executive has been running on a skeleton crew for a while now. Over the past term, we have barely been able to keep half a cabinet, and there are essentially no ministries supporting that cabinet. My paramount goal is to revitalize the executive and begin the process of cultivating a new pool of talent that will one day lead a thriving and active Coalition.

This will require examining each step in a new player’s journey into and within TSP, including recruitment, welcoming, applications and, most importantly, opportunities to get involved in the executive. This can be slow and difficult structural work. I have come to you today with my proposal for what I, should you elect me, will use as a starting point, but I am open to feedback and adaptation as we feel out the right path forward as a community. My goal for this term specifically is to use the PM seat as a test kitchen.

Recruitment, Communication and The Wizard

Just because we are guaranteed 10% of new spawns doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t put effort into recruitment. Anything we can do to increase the flow of people into the region is worth it. As such, I want to make recruitment telegrams a priority program, both for myself personally and any interested member of the community. I also wish to explore second-day telegrams as an additional layer of integration outreach after the hectic barrage of information that comes when first creating an account. We also should participate in interregional events with enthusiasm, demonstrating our community as a welcoming and inviting one for people searching for a new home.

Then, we need to consider the conversion of players who have only newly joined the region into ones that have connections to our wider systems. This takes the form of several key bits of messaging:

  • Regular communications from the executive via regional telegrams.
  • Advertisement of Coalition services and opportunities on the RMB.
  • A full look over and update of our dispatches.

Finally, we need to make the process of actually getting involved as easy as possible. To me, that means a significant overhaul of the Getting Involved Wizard in a way that better explains the options open to new players and better suits the needs of the individual organizations it serves. I would also like to expand the offerings in the Wizard as well. Kringle had started much of this work; I intend to see it through.

A Model for Involvement: The Tripartite Ministry

I believe that at its core, each government ministry should be composed of three layers: the Minister at the top, a trusted group of semi-permanent advisors or senior staff, and a beginner-friendly body for newer people to learn and get involved in.

The base layer is supremely important. We need to come to terms with the fact that we’re playing a government simulator game, and many people would find a greater sense of belonging by being involved in the government of their region, even if they can only do so in a small way. This is about more than just being able to do more as a government (though that is definitely part of it!), it’s about providing stepping-stone positions to greater activity and responsibility in the region.

Between the beginner-friendly base layer and the minister, I believe that each minister ought to have a standing body of advisors and senior members of the ministry. These groups act both as a stores of institutional knowledge from administration to administration as well as trusted members of the community with which the minister can discuss potentially sensitive topics.

I will discuss below the specific structure and activities of the various ministries, but since an org-chart is worth a million words, consider this my thesis statement:

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Should I be elected Prime Minister, my flagship project for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs will be the reestablishment of an Ambassador Corps, which will serve as the entry-level program for people looking to get involved in the ministry. At face value, Ambassadors will be responsible for:

  • Being a representative of our community and a friendly face in other regions, looking to create positive associations with the Coalition.
  • Reporting to the minister notable happenings from their assigned region, keeping the government up to date on any and all emerging situations abroad.
  • Promoting the fruits of a revitalized Ministry of Culture.
  • Advising the minister on decisions made relevant to their assigned region.

I believe that an Ambassador Corps is a perfect vehicle for involvement because it has a clear mandate, easily scalable responsibility (by varying number or size of regions in a portfolio) and easily scalable program size (can start with only a few people and grow over time).

Luckily, the Foreign Affairs Council already exists as the trusted middle-tier of the ministry. Outside of the structural work, my goal will be to strengthen our relationships with our traditional defender allies, particularly in the wake of the moderation crisis that has strained relations.

The Ministry of Culture

Unlike the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, I do not feel like there is a single group that could make up the introductory body of the Ministry of Culture. Rather, I intend to create project groups to work on discrete programs within the ministry. I would like to see some projects become permanently standing, though I accept many will be temporary as needed.

Projects I would like to take on include:

  • An official regional newspaper, in a more sustainable format than Vrigny and I attempted a few months ago. (Maybe publishing three times a week was too much?)
  • Regular small events, such as game nights on both the RMB and Discord.
  • Going absolutely all out for the upcoming Defender Awards, as well as the regional holidays coming up in the next three months.
  • Another round of our regional hockey league (pending my ability to force Henn to run it).

Culture is not my strong suit, so I look forward to collaboration with a strong Minister of Culture. I also wish to publish a Culture and Events calendar early in the term to keep us accountable to the things we want to do and allow people in the region to plan ahead of time to attend if they wish.

Should I be elected, I intend to resurrect the Domestic Affairs Council to serve as the advisory middle body of the Ministry of Culture as well as (at least temporarily) Recruitment and Integration. Each project group should have at least one member within the DAC in order for us to effectively coordinate.

The Ministry of Defense

I do not wish to spend too much time here, because the bulk of my current agenda as Minister of Defense stands. I recently posted a progress update about my work as MoD, where I outline what has been done and what is left to do.

In summary, I wish to work with a new Minister of Defense to finish out the infrastructural work I started, and then capitalize on it for a major recruitment push.

The Cabinet Appointments

The single hardest thing for a PM to do these days seems to be finding enough of the right people to form a cabinet. I expect this would be a question if I didn’t say it upfront anyways, so I want to address my plans ahead of time. It is my intention to appoint ministers of Foreign Affairs, Culture and Defense. I have people in mind for these already, and will seek to present them to the assembly for confirmation as soon as I am physically able to after the election so as to give them the largest amount of time in the term to achieve our goals.

Recruitment and Integration, being so fundamental to my campaign vision, is an area that I plan on spearheading personally, but will be looking to open applications to bring on members interested in becoming recruiters, greeters, guide-writers, etc.

Conflict of Interest Statement

My nation was founded in the South Pacific, and in the South Pacific I have stayed. I do not hold citizenship or any positions in any region outside of TSP, nor have I at any point in the past. I operate approximately 400 puppet nations, used exclusively for R/D and, recently, N-Day. I have never used an alias other than “Heliseum/Heli” to interact with any region in any context.

Within TSP, I am a Citizen, Legislator, Lieutenant of the SPSF and Minister of Defense. The current term as MoD is my third in an equivalent position; I was MoMA for two terms back in 2020. Additionally, I am an Update Commander in Libcord, the multi-regional military organization through which the SPSF operates with its allies.

5 Likes

Non political question: What dessert party do you align with?

2 Likes

I am and will always be a dedicated Pieist :pie_tspie:

4 Likes

Noted, thanks. :shortcake:

1 Like

I personally really valued the opportunity to get involved in ministries early on when I joined TSP, and I’m very glad to see that you have a strong focus on bringing this back.

Furthermore, in the short time since I’ve made my most recent return to NationStates, I’ve been very impressed by your work as Minister of Defense. The work you’ve done to improve the integration of the SPSF gives me confidence that you can effectively improve integration for the whole region.

I do have one question–how does Recruitment and Integration fit into your ultimate vision for the ministry structure? Will it be within the Ministry of Culture, its own Ministry separate from the others, or something else?

1 Like

Very easily done, but you will not be escaping discussions on what to change for the second season of the SPHL.

I’ll bring out some questions soon, pending a confirmation on hosting a PM debate.

This makes me exceptionally happy to hear, thank you for your kind words.

Thanks for this question! My ultimate goal (i.e. what I would love to see beyond this immediate term) would be that Recruitment and Integration become its own ministry separate from, but working closely with, the Ministry of Culture. I could honestly see them sharing the same ‘middle tier’ space in the DAC. I don’t want to tack it onto Culture because of how disproportionately large I feel that would make the Minister of Culture’s portfolio.

I didn’t introduce it in this campaign as a fully separate Ministry for this term because of the decision not to appoint a Minister. That decision itself was twofold: Firstly, as mentioned, it is so central to my vision for the term that I will be very heavily involved there directly. Secondly, admittedly, I was worried about the very high likelihood that I wouldn’t be able to find an appointee. I wanted to avoid the situation where a lengthy search extends far into the campaign and I delay putting any of this into action. That being said, if someone is reading this and thinking “I mean I’d love to work on Recruitment and Integration!” please reach out.

In the end, my thought was that if I don’t/can’t appoint a minister, and they would be sharing DAC, perhaps Recruitment and Integration needs to start as an intense separate project and grow into being its own Ministry. Maybe that can happen over the course of the term, but I didn’t feel confident promising that out the gate.

1 Like

I would love to have these discussions! No escape attempts will happen.

Would love for you to host a debate.

On the MoFA, I couldn’t agree more. I humbly believe that strengthening of relationships will naturally happen in the stages following the re-establishment of an Ambassador Corps, because having as close to as many Ambassadors as we can representing us to our allies and embassies, we have our foot in the door with our neighbours and encouraging Ambassadors to do more than just the job at hand, get involved, chat in their servers, if they have events, join in with them, then this strengthening of relationships can only happen naturally and most likely quicker than expected.

In addition to the above, you are recruiting Ambassadors, but you want them to stick around, they have to enjoy being an Ambassador and they have to enjoy being involved with their appointed region, if they do not, then it becomes like work and they head for the door.

(Note: I’m looking at this as someone who’s done the rounds in TSP as PM/MoFA/etc., but had been fairly absent for a while)

Well … frankly, a good campaign. I don’t have much to add.

This is a fairly inward turned campaign (which isn’t a bad thing!), but since that was my strong suit back in the day, anything in terms of actual foreign policy you’d like to speak about?

1 Like

I apologize for the delay in answering this question! I thought I had just ahead of the debate last night. My campaign is quite an inward one, yes, largely because the general theme of my campaign is inward-looking and structural. However, if I were to define a policy goal for FA, it would be working to instill amongst our Defender allies (TRR, TGW, XKI, etc) the same kind of tight-knit cooperative axis that we’ve seen spring up in the indie sphere this year. I would like to see some life in Aegis.

Also, since I am not one to back down from a joke, dare and winning over of a voter (for those confused see the RMB) I hereby declare myself pro-feet.

3 Likes

How will you avoid the pitfalls we had in the past where there were large groups of “members” of Ministries who did not actually do work on projects and where projects got bogged down in infinite conversation and Ministers became people managers?

Ranked 4th. Absolutely not

1 Like

So long as you’re anti-ankle

2 Likes

Thanks for this question, and I’m really sorry for my delay in answering it. The answer is multi-faceted:

Firstly, I’m not planning to have standing bodies of Ministry members without clear mandates. “Members” of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs will be Ambassadors, with a clear job to do. “Members” of the Ministry of Culture will really be members of, say, the newspaper team, or an event team, etc. Additionally, ministers, any potential project heads and I need to be somewhat ruthless about removing inactive people. All entry-level positions should be designed such that removing someone for inactivity doesn’t cause a crisis.

Secondly, particularly in Culture, we need to operate with public deadlines. I will be publishing a Culture calendar very early in my term in collaboration with my MoC that lays out every event and major project we wish to take on. I will be rigidly enforcing those deadlines, which I hope will spur teams to get over the infinite talking stage.

Finally, I think we should accept that people managing is an inevitable part of leading a ministry that is more than one person. In the long run, direct oversight of many groups is probably better done by some semi-permanent deputized civil service, but that takes time to come into existence. Growing into delegation will be key.

1 Like

Possibly by listening to the people who are trying to save your Ministry before you’ve done anything, whom you ignore and then they end up being right, at a wild guess.

I don’t expect you to remember what I’m on about.

Thanks for your response!

That’s good! My follow up question then is how the on-boarding process will work once someone declares intent to be involved in a Ministry. In the past, we would add people to a Ministry channel and expect them to “figure it out”. How would you do things now that you’d be expecting people to be involved in specific projects?

That’s good to hear. Will you publicly communicate progress and/or deadlines in other Ministries as well?

I don’t think your distaste for me is what Heliseum’s campaign for Prime Minister is about and I am not interested in relitigating the issue here.

I unfortunately think it’s more than just me that has a distaste for that.

People are entitled to their opinions of me and my past actions in various governmental offices. None of it is the subject of Heliseum’s campaign for Prime Minister.

1 Like

Well, it sort of is, you asked the question about pitfalls in the past, presumably you are also referring to your own pitfall, so it actually is directly relevant to the campaign.