I’m counter suing Tin for framing Tin as a alleged TSP coup-er.
1 Like
CRIMINAL CASE
I declare that Tin “Holy Free” Vrynlord is hereby sued for trying frame Tin for Treason
The compensation shall be @lordnwahs positions’ as they are the one who suggested this.
AFFAIRE CRIMINELLE
Je déclare que Tin « Holy Free » Vrynlord est poursuivi en justice pour avoir tenté de le piéger en l’accusant de trahison.
Les dommages et intérêts seront versés à @lordnwahs, car c’est lui qui a suggéré cette action.
刑事案件
我在此宣布，Tin “Holy Free” Vrynlord 因试图陷害 Tin 犯有叛国罪而被起诉。
赔偿金额将由 @lordnwahs 承担，因为是他提出了这个建议。
KRIMINA KAZO
Mi deklaras, ke Tin “Sankta Libera” Vrynlord estas ĉi-pere jurpersekutita pro akuzo de Tin pro Ŝtatperfido.
La kompenso estos la pozicioj de @lordnwahs, ĉar ili estas tiuj, kiuj sugestis tion.
now that is a dang lot of cases, can I just decide the result without talking with the other judges?
1 Like
no
1 Like
Supreme Court of the South Pacific
————————————————————
This is a case before the Supreme Court of the South Pacific considered under the following information:
Docket Number
CR.04
Reference Name
Counter-Sue Calling Can-made-metal Conman Couping
Request
Determine whether or not Tin attempted to frame Tin for treason.
Date
24 Feb 2026
Supera Kortumo de la Suda Pacifiko
—————————————————————
Ĉi tiu estas kazo antaŭ la Supera Kortumo de la Suda Pacifiko konsiderata laŭ la jenaj informoj:
Dosiernumero
CR.04
Referenca Nomo
Kontraŭproceso Nomante Kuponon el Ladskatolo
Peto
Determini ĉu Tin provis enkadrigi Tin-on pro ŝtatperfido aŭ ne.
Dato
24 Feb 2026
南太平洋最高法院
————————————————————
本案由南太平洋最高法院审理，案情如下：
案卷编号
CR.04
原告名称
反诉指控“罐头金属骗子”库平
请求
确定蒂恩是否试图陷害蒂恩犯叛国罪。
日期
2026年2月24日
Cour suprême du Pacifique Sud
————————————————————
La Cour suprême du Pacifique Sud est saisie de cette affaire, examinée sur la base des informations suivantes :
Numéro de dossier
CR.04
Nom de la référence
Poursuite reconventionnelle contre l’escroc « Can-made-metal Conman Couping »
Demande
Déterminer si Tin a tenté de piéger Tin pour trahison.
Date
24 février 2026
I called my first witness @Tin!
1 Like
What do you mean ME???
Where were you at the time at the framing?
What do you mean I’m you!
Got no alibi, huh?
What do you mean there’s no time of framing.
To be conTinued…
1 Like
No response ay? he’s guilty your honor!
I plead the fifth, also you’re the one who didn’t response
Since you won’t talk I’ll bring another witness of your character!
Who? you got nothing on you.
I call my first husband @Erstavik, he can testify to your character!
3 Likes
Wtf are you doing
3 Likes
Counter-Sueing myself.
tin sueing….himself?
twice!
Yes
Is he always trying to frame others for things they didn’t do? if so are there any examples?
Keeping it open
INVALID Inactivity
(This decision overule Cayo’s one)
This post invalidates Hamborn’s invalidation of this case, therefore this case is valid
This invalid the invalidation of my post that invalidate the case
This invalidates the invalidation of my invalidation which invalidated the invalidation of the case