As he mean that Article 205 is the last article :
We can’t know so Article 2165 is illegal
Article 2166: As Cayo said, Article 205 is invalid as if it is, then the entire Constitution will be invalid thus making it useless.
So article 2166 is illegal
Your whole life is illegal
Article 2167: this is wrong because
‘Everyone is wrong’ means that Besern is wrong
Which means Article 205 by Besern is wrong
Which means that Everyone is right and it is not the end
But if everyone is right that means Besern and Article 205 are right
Which means Everyone is wrong
‘Everyone is wrong’ means that Besern is wrong
Which means Article 205 by Besern is wrong
Which means that Everyone is right and it is not the end
But if everyone is right that means Besern and Article 205 are right
Which means Everyone is wrong
‘Everyone is wrong’ means that Besern is wrong
Which means Article 205 by Besern is wrong
Which means that Everyone is right and it is not the end
But if everyone is right that means Besern and Article 205 are right
Which means Everyone is wrong
‘Everyone is wrong’ means that Besern is wrong
Which means Article 205 by Besern is wrong
Which means that Everyone is right and it is not the end
But if everyone is right that means Besern and Article 205 are right
Which means Everyone is wrong
‘Everyone is wrong’ means that Besern is wrong
Which means Article 205 by Besern is wrong
Which means that Everyone is right and it is not the end
But if everyone is right that means Besern and Article 205 are right
Which means Everyone is wrong
‘Everyone is wrong’ means that Besern is wrong
Which means Article 205 by Besern is wrong
Which means that Everyone is right and it is not the end
But if everyone is right that means Besern and Article 205 are right
Which means Everyone is wrong
‘Everyone is wrong’ means that Besern is wrong
Which means Article 205 by Besern is wrong
Which means that Everyone is right and it is not the end
But if everyone is right that means Besern and Article 205 are right
Which means Everyone is wrong
‘Everyone is wrong’ means that Besern is wrong
Which means Article 205 by Besern is wrong
Which means that Everyone is right and it is not the end
But if everyone is right that means Besern and Article 205 are right
Which means Everyone is wrong
‘Everyone is wrong’ means that Besern is wrong
Which means Article 205 by Besern is wrong
Which means that Everyone is right and it is not the end
But if everyone is right that means Besern and Article 205 are right
Which means Everyone is wrong
‘Everyone is wrong’ means that Besern is wrong
Which means Article 205 by Besern is wrong
Which means that Everyone is right and it is not the end
But if everyone is right that means Besern and Article 205 are right
Which means Everyone is wrong
.
.
.
Still the same way Constitution II disapear after Article 205.
It actually exists and does not exist at the same time, Schrödinger’s Constitution 
(I don’t know what I am saying)
TM的憲法
The question is : if it’s a paradox mean that The constitution is legal and illegal in the same time
So either legalize it and make the constitution useless or illegalize it to make the constitution legal again.
psst
Notes that comments are illegal here— I may or may not be risking being sued to post this to inform you
we cant legalize or illegalize as we are wrong and right in same time
But he is wrong and right so we can and we can’t. So repealing is useless
hmm that is actually a good point
Article 2168
Repeals Article 205, 2156, 2157, 2158, 2159, 2161, 2163, 2164, 2165, 2166 and 2167 to settle ALL this bs down
Article 2168 is illegal and legal in the same way you just helped more the paradox
I repealed Article 205, ending the paradox
Article 2169: Article 2168 is repealed as it does not provide adequate reasoning on the repeal.
Constitution III on fire
Everything is on fire