Article 1619:
Article 1615 is rescinded for being in violation of Article 1612 as it is not in the interest of the majority of people.
Furthermore, it is to be noted that no article can be immune to repulsion, generally, as such an article would limit the functioning of the Assembly and any other government bodies. Such an article would limit the democratic functioning of the South Pacific as a whole.
As such, a provision is now made such that any article with 3 likes or more is a permanent article that cannot be repealed. If an article attains this qualification after repulsion, the article in question shall be reinstated.
Moreover, it is to be noted that repulsion of a non-permanent article is the right of any citizen of the South Pacific and cannot be condemned as it is essential to maintaining the relevance of the Constitution.
Lastly, Any other attempts by any citizen or legislator, no matter their position, at introducing an irremovable or unamendable article will lead to them being unrecognized as a contributor to the Constitution II of the South Pacific. Any articles published by them in the past and in the future will be repealed with immediate haste and they shall not be furthermore recognized. @CayonNs shall not suffer these consequences now because this was not explicitly stated before.
Note: As evidence, that Article 1615 is not in the interest of the majority of people, various channels are to be noted that have opposed TUA and MEAT. These channels have been run by and/or funded by a number of people, including @Franz, @Zhuang, @pyrocxrals, and @North. On the contrary, TUA and MEAT have only been supported by @CayonNS. That is a 4:1 majority for anti-TUA/anti-MEAT movements. Evidence of these posts have been attached below.
Additionally, these are not the only anti-TUA efforts but only a few of numerous examples.