The fruit on the trees, the flowers in the ground, the wind in your hair, the ice cream in your stomach
BN, same question
The fruit on the trees, the flowers in the ground, the wind in your hair, the ice cream in your stomach
BN, same question
Im too lazy to think of anything philosophical
BN, same question?
Huh
Bn
It’s to hold somebody’s hand and think we’re gay and lively
Do I know you?
Yes also happy birthday!
Bn, do you like pie
No
BN, 6 or 7?
Cabinet Order 67
BN, favorite order at McDonalds?
I like Subway
Favourite order at the Finnish Restaurant?
What Finnish restaurant?
Bn??
The one in Finland.
BN: are fish food or friends?
Both
BN, favorite kind of fish (for friendship or food)
Salmon.. dont have it often but it’s peak
Bn
Cod or halibut
BN, favorite number?
Eight,
How about you, BN?
Also eight.
BN, what’s your favourite colour?
Black, because I’m really cool and edgy.
BN?
Wait- asking my crush
BN
Huh?
BN, what’s the solution to the trolley problem?
For the Sisyphus Trolley Problem, one should answer;
If there is one person (you); the diverter+ Sisyphus (+1) that means it’s 2+ people since the hotel is both full and infinite it means there’s cantors hierarchy of transfinite cardinals; assume aleph null, and therefore each member in given equal infinite (aleph null) for merely sitting room where time flows slowly for themselves and where Sisyphus’s reality is non-existent if we assume time operating under time dilation, which is under general relativity, coincident to space; Minkowski Spacetime, as the room temparature graduated, particle configuration vibrate in different sequence of vibrational modes from standard continuous (infinitely divisible) spacetime; three spatial, one temporal. and therefore the rock in my backyard participates in the same 4 dimensional spacetime continuum as humans mentally witness even if there’s no awareness to realize it’s substantial existence because potential existence; potentiality, and actual existence; actuality, are more so same thing under Aristoliean hylomorphism, which divine causes into effect, therefore if he didn’t, it’s necessarily unrealized, potential than nothingness, impossible-under the assumption of dissolution of creator-creation difference and divine omnipotence laying down his set of divine attributes therefore his divine immanence-if all divine notions are definitionally parasitic to omnipotence, and therefore, pantheism; creator and creation are nondual. but because he externally administered it, it’s panentheistic divine expression, spacetime is not fundamental (sensory-cognitive illusion); “maya” in Advaita Vedanta philosophy and divine is dimensionless (trancendent): creator of spacetime in classical theism but in monistic, panentheistic, pantheistic traditions(as hinduism) and etc where creator-creation barrier is closed, the spacetime becomes reduced, ontologically posterior relational manifestation of self (divine) per se seeing all dimensions as co-equal just as fourth was hypothetically viewed by fifth dimensional entities on above page
Plus, dimensional asymmetry, omnipotence paradox reinterpreted (if god is omnipotent he can do anything as he wills even senseless to our conception of “reason”) Here, assuming to put into existence the potential tendency of three dimensional existences into fourth, as 3 dimensions ate potentialities for 4 dimensional actualities also applies here, any lesser dimensional entities just like us, as we presuppose, can’t interact extra dimensional non-relational truths and god could have done it but Since our senses are not evolved to higher dimensions for survival mechanism, we can’t access them yet and therefore that’s may be the reason we have depth perception (third dimensional relational experience) where none extramentally exists at all. but because of block universe theory and 4dism (as supported by general relativity) time is an continuous and indivisible emergence under the root of our physical existence-an ontologically identical and extended subsistence in idealization of free space but also biopsychologically unstable to experience because of our evolved evolutionarily-prohibited, epistemic access and unfitness in external environmental and internal neuropychological conditions if conciousness is everywhere because to assume it is to assume it indivisibly and since only spatial separations introduce “in and out” of something particular, we can distinguish that consciousness with no spatiality must be homogenously living across the cosmos-and beyond if possible and if classical theists respond by saying god continuously cause, maintain, destroy universe at respective periods, then they have to also agree on cause encompassing pre-existence of effect; before actualization, and that case is also available to thomistic philosophy or effect encompassing pre-existence of cause (absurd, but in nondual perspectives these are treated same thing, and time-symmetric nature of quantum mechanics further validates it) Therefore homogenously co-present everywhere (assumes panentheism)
Since both agrees on same reasoning (thomistic and pantheistic philosophies) either of them must be wrong or atleast partially incorrect in light of principle of contradiction since creator creating something needs time, and time needs background substance to shift around from atemporal to temporal relations—as nothingness is inattributable (indescribable) And time is attribute of anything particular entities that have mass, as universals like impersonal or abstract but indivisible from the intellect of God—Divine Conceptualism. it’s the two, independent plane of orientation that stratifies a false sense of third—dimensional but evolutionarily perfected emergence. birthed from second dimensional informational—geometry playing under the stages-predicating from Holographic Principle, String Theory, Quantum Gravity, Theory of Everything (TOE) -unconscious matter=3D (+1 temporal as dispositional essense) substimelin—are always measured spatially extended into them, as fourth dimension because time is treated as another spatial cordinate from the angle of special relativity (on conditions of strong gravitational influence motion bordering near-speed-of-light travel) meaning as mass tends towards speed of light and speed of light maintains spacetime coherency and since spacetime is atleast fourth dimensional or as far as practically evidenced, and light and spacetime (not just space) are inseparable under, and since other models too exists but have underwent through scientific method, we can argue that’s it’s written in stone for any counter to register it must have come scientific form of experiment confirmation aswell it’s sure that speed of light is also 4D, it experiences all three modes of time, past-present-future, but never all the same because that’s what 5th dimension do-seeing every possible timeline co-equally therefore the universe only permits space (vacuum) to outreach light as it’s medium and time adjusts to keep the cosmic limit consistent
Technically, light (electromagnetic
waves) are born from electric field
and magnetic field oscillating bumps, for examining their self-sustaining nature, we either need infinite, internal energy content or there states must be infinite external shifting in supposed non-infinite, internal energy content which is falsifiable under the inapplication of electrogmagnetic phase difference (therefore, scientifically available to valid potential theory) and since all universe is either personal or impersonal (because conciousness is proved) then personal universemeans all quantum possibilities or trajectories of particles are their “choices” and that they have proto-conciousness–issuing anpsychism and choices relationally register upon our intellect based on internal, past-karma + external, ‘present-karma–aligning-to- past-karma’ -quantum dispositions from environment (informationally entangled geometry) to be realized from the observation itself- (Quantum Idealism, Copenhagen interpretation, Neo Copenhagen interpretation) -or Ishvara, From
hindu philosophy, distributing karmic debts Assuming moral judgement are concious and tendencies are non-concious (subconscious or unconscious) it must always be placed after actualising your specific mental orientations(like thoughts, desires, dreams etc) and since all moral choices are personal possibilities, that means quantum possibilities (qualitative, quantum probabilities) which are impersonal possibilities are later judged personally when entered the intellect of someone with personality, as ‘moral or immoral’ sometimes even amoral and etc. psycholinguistic labels based on their past-reincarnated psychology therefore the experience or qualia of everyone, is differentiable-inverted qualia, and is defined a reaction between ‘The Other And The Self’
Which ultimately, causes the world as we see today to occur as it is what’s dove but still countless cycles of reincarnation and therefore making experience, have made our unexplained instincts just as evolution does aimed to do so, and surprisingly, that’s also in line of evolutionary biology so it they both must be true not one without the other that’s intellectual hypocrisy- with respected psychology areas, That are coinciding with plethora of evidences, and are mutually incompatible without keeping the other Therefore, forming ethical judgements after being concious of actions exercised through subconscious, karmic tendencies made available (because from principle of propositional causation, everything that comes from A must present in B as a effect even in little bit negligible terms) For example, sun and its rays and its sound all have same heatness, same colour and same source of origin (Because of their essense, which gets distributed upon causal processions) since all dimensions are in distance of another infinitely indivisible dimensions from each other, at quantum scales they are continuous but is introduced to discreteness because of string particles different behaviours; (1) open (2) closed and fractal dimensions bordering between may exist -because quantum field theory manifests therefore since we assumed aleph null, and our spacetime dimensions were Minkowski spacetime (from the perspective of the inside the room null) And Pseudo-Riemannian Manifold (Lorentzian Manifold) for environment ignoring room null case as humans are psychologically, with 4d concious-mind, assuming we can memory (past), attention (present) and expectation (future) in psyche-baked internal clocks Our psychobiological body is 3D inert matter but mind is 4D breath of living conciousness alien to the source “There are three times: a present of things past, a present of things present, and a present of things future” - Saint Augustine, Confessions, Book XI, Chapter 20, Section 26 Translation: Henry Chadwick, Confessions, Oxford University Press, 1991
Under the assumption everything is temporary and energy is finite to support that premise, energy conservation must mean it’s either false or energy can convert into infinitely while remaining finite (assuming, continuous indivisible spacetime on cosmological level) (explained by entropy since it gives us time have now a direction to move, and in energy, ‘who is opposed to entropy’, is inversely propositional in dictating their mass -energy trajectory) all these point-particles are actually tiny vibrating strings, and there are two types of strings; closed and open closed strings are used for forces like gravity, open strings for everything other. perhaps for spacetime quantization aswell and dilation (possibly working for time dilation) The only and most criticised problem is there’s no background geometry in string theory and that’s a big one to contemplate honestly, because it reconciles the discreteness of spacetime at quantum scales to absoluteness of spacetime at cosmological scales of spacetime (quantum foam at small scales). and their determinism and free will coexistence-(like compatibilism, libertarianism hard determinism, indeterminism debates and etc.) and revolving insights aswell. If string theory can try to quantize spacetime, just as loop quantum gravity and other models already mathematically formulated. we’ve been already gotten far away, or better to formulate (or merge) background model exclusively from loop Quantum gravity if that mathematically elegant or made a theory from these two such that they might not contradict but give fundamental insights that were indivisible from solely each other in individuals. -extra spatial 4 dimensions + 1 temporal dimensions now (5D) Since 5d is above 4D human intellects that are sufficiently concious, 5D must also have same attributes as will with exotic and leveraged to infinite distance from fourth and act beyond relativistic causality -“Physically” explains emergentist and entanglement programs, David Bohm’s Pilot-wave from Pilot-Wave Theory which mesh well with deterministic. ontologically predictable nature of karma theory aswell)
It’s valid to say temparature would also instantly act if something extra is added from external background like another person than already sufficient to live at. and since these persons are used to the room temparature however high it is to external observers. They are immune to it even though two of said external observers like you (diverter) and Sisyphus could not conceptualize such ideality of reality. Now since there’s atleast one room empty and one room for infinite is still infinite we have infinite empty rooms and infinite full rooms at hierarchical timelines which later diverged (supports many-worlds interpretation). and so choices doesn’t collapse the wavefunction but the wavefunction is always collapsed you just choose and therefore ‘trigger’ your location even if unknown to you. to the collapsed one feeling like you collapsed it while that never happened. since there are infinite versions of spacetime rifts now, there are infinite percentages to infinite percentages that you either winn or not assuming infinity is divisible (cantors transfinites are because of hierarchical structure) and there’s infinite cardinal aleph null to infinite cardinal aleph infinity and there’s finite time outside infinite time inside each therefore infinite at whole and infinite raise to the power of infinite for all the timelines. since we have two options nd that needs infinities divisible and that needs infinities hierarchical Therefore infinities are divisible and optable and so there are chances that the boulder is thrown at the empty one and chances of negation since both are divisible they are either equally divisible or unequally divisible Since it’s not the case they are unequally divisible but unequally divisible only in their contextual applications Spacetime (1) was slowed, spacetime (2) was fast Therefore spacetime 1 if slowed can’t never reach spacetime 2 since we are talking about multiverses there is also a universe where spacetime 2 have the condition of what spacetime 1 have and vice versa (under different explanation or same as implemented here under different approach though because varied physical laws)
Let us take potential-possibility Non-potential-actuality=necessity If spacetime (laws-multiverse) is contingent? Both If spacetime is fundamental? Necessity If spacetime is emergent? (1) ontologically? Same as fundamental so necessity (2) Epistemicaly? No so same as contingent, under ontological level differenct, under epistemic level differenct; useful approximations of ontological but not ontologically unfilted which these both domains works as seperate fundamental laws within their universe though it’s varying across others; they are not parallel universes 1.Both 2.Necessity 3.Necessity 4.Both → But since mind-universe, therefore fundamental again, the universe=self can’t be eternal but powered through the eternal undying source of all; nondual awareness (or “brahman”) in Indian traditions Therefore, since the last option is syntactically comparable to the first they both follow the same tract of reasoning: fundamental (=necessity) Therefore our knowledge of laws of nature/ physics=eternal, unvarying and unchanging not just nomologically or intrinsic to the universe but any universes out there that might exist or not And this makes multiverse chances even low because it’s in their genetics that they have different ontology of spacetime, meaning, life and death and obviously physical and natural laws governing them and the universe. So, instead of multiverse, parallel universes are far more easily theoretically explicable under known laws and theories if they remain consistent and proved true by future Therefore in each multiverse (or ‘spacetime timelines’) our Sisyphus boulders infinitely always have one empty room to send down his boulder and be relieved because that’s what tensioning him from so long So coming back to your question “Is Sisyphus happy?” Yes! Because he got a load of his boulder and may have relieved. somewhat in empty room next to the other which have infinite numbers of rooms so it’s never +1, and therefore it was inevitable for his fate to conquer himself because of his past-loaded karma his “now” is transformed
Now, since the boulder aren’t going to in any modally, possible multiverse frame in the direction of Ship of Theseus it’s safe and if it’s not indivisible it doesn’t have an continued identity, but if it’s ground is nondual to what it physical apperance? Then yes, because under the assumption that both illusion and fundamental hierarchy to something lesser fundamental is consistent. we can say the physical apperance is illusion and the ground underlying it, might be the what we call “The One True ship of Theseus” as witnessed in eastern nonduality philosophies like Advaita Vedanta, Nagarjuna’s philosophy, heck realizing this is called liberation (moksha) there, so since it’s inevitable by fate, for the ship to destroy and the fate overrides over any contextual tools that means the ship is “indestructible” and soul-as-itself (noumenon) from kants transcendental idealism philosophy where the appearance might have faded over time when Sisyphus exhausted all his bad karma from past-lives, and therefore became pure to see direct noumenon immediately, he achieved Buddha-hood and realised himself as one with Nondual Brahman and even Paramaśiva from Kashmiri Shavism Who has thrown himself in this in playful act of divine blissfulness (divine self-sufficiently and freedom) only to find him back or re-cognize Formally “Pratyabhijñā (प्रत्यभिज्ञा”)" meaning re-cognition of what already known. Where the world is seen as more like an eternal concious expansion of your soul or jiva than God (=Siva) who are ultimately the same being but misidentified from body-mind complex and therefore, retaining smallness (Aņutā) or finitudes of comparison.
BN, did you read all of that word salad?
I aint reading all that!
Bn?