Greetings. @CayonNS has something to say:
Below is the special law:
The court decided to reverse its action of ruling that I, Cayo have the ownership of the entire hill due to it not properly addressing the claims of other people, such as Konsa and ExquisiteGentleman. However, according to the law, claims made by people other than Cayo are illegal, and therefore must be rendered null and void. Therefore, there is absolutely no problem at all with the original decision of the court and it is obvious that the court must announce that Cayo is the owner of the hill once again.
You might think that there are people who claim that Cayo’s special law could be unconstitutional and simply just unfair. However, Cayo would like to prove that this is false, and that no one thinks so using a poll with a set amount of time:
- Yes
Cayo would like to say again that the hill is obviously Cayo’s. However, if the court rules that Cayo’s special law is unconstitutional, Cayo shall repeal it himself and also fire frozen solid ice cream blocks soaked in liquid nitrogen at the judge using a cannon for the nonsense. Just in case somebody suspects that Cayo is lying about this, Cayo shall write a Constitution II article about this in two hours from the posting of this message.
Thank you,
The Obvious Owner of The Hill,
CayonNS/Altnavia