The Charter states:
I prefer extant CitComm members to go through one of these two processes rather than being directly become CRS members, in the event that more than two-fifths of the Assembly do not approve one or more members of the current CitComm becoming CRS members.
I would prefer the CRS to involve directly the Court about a citizenship suspension, and if the Court approves it only then the suspension can be enacted. I don’t really see how a simple citizen could pose such a treath to require and immediate suspension (that may also not be justified) by the CRS.
What about the Mantaining Legislatorship requirements? I guess you want to remove them (as I think adding them to the citizenship requirements would be too extreme), but I’m not really keen either on approving that.