[2301.HC] Legislator Committee vs. PodracingFan/Bowzin

High Court
1
HIGH COURT OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC
CASE SUBMISSION

Petition
The Legislator Committee asks the Court to find probable cause that PodracingFan committed Identity Fraud, and thereby indict them in accordance with Judicial Act 5.1.

Description
The Legislator Committee found substantial evidence that the Legislator known as @PodracingFan was an alternate account of the player known as Bowzin, an affiliation which was not disclosed on their Legislator application. The Legislator application form clearly asks for that information here:

image
image2418×1290 120 KB

PodracingFan admitted to being an alternate account of Bowzin here. Given this confession, we believe this is sufficient evidence to indict Bowzin of the crime of identity fraud, but can produce additional evidence on request of the High Court as needed.

1 Like
2

HIGH COURT OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC
[2301.HC] LEGISLATOR COMMITTEE VS. PODRACINGFAN/BOWZIN
SUBMISSION 18 APRIL 2023

Notice is given that this question has been received by the High Court and has been assigned all the necessary identifying information as follows:

DOCKET NUMBER
2301.HC

REFERENCE NAME
Legislator Committee vs. PodracingFan/Bowzin

CHARGE
Identity Fraud

The petitioner and other interested parties are invited to explain the existence or lack of probable cause for the charges no later than 28 April 2023 12:00 UTC, but the Court reserves the right to make a determination after the accused party has exercised their right to dispute the charge. Briefs Amicus Curiae on the preferred eventual outcome of this case are not required at this time.

2301.HC.NR | Issued 23 April 2023

3

I have no intention of disputing these claims, and wish to plead guilty.

4

Your honors,

PodracingFan has repeatedly confessed to being Bowzin (including the above post). I believe that itself is more than enough probable cause for an indictment.

5
HIGH COURT OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC
[2301.HC] LEGISLATOR COMMITTEE V. PODRACINGFAN

Determination
This case is found to have probable cause and therefore PodracingFan is indicted with the charge of committing identity fraud.

Considerations
The defendant and the general public may argue before the Court on all matters relevant to this case no later than 2023-04-27T14:00:00Z.

Submission: 18 April 2023 | Determination: 24 April 2023

6
The Court would appreciate if the Legislator Committee, either through @HumanSanity or any one of its members, could provide further clarity on what "substantial evidence" indicated to them that PodracingFan was an alternate account for Bowzin.
7

Your honors,

I apologize for the delay.

I’d like to request permission to submit the evidence to the Court via private message so as to avoid disclosing the exact counter-intelligence methods utilized.

Additionally, some information will be submitted via private message since it contains personally identifying information.

8

The Court is amenable to receiving the requested information via private means.

9

Thank you, your honor. Which Justices should receive this information?

10

Justices Kringle and Belschaft are presiding over this case.

11

If I am not too late, I’d like to request my personal information not be shared needlessly, especially considering I have pleaded guilty.

12

The Court clarifies that it does not seek access to personally identifying information; it merely seeks to have a clearer understanding of the process and types of evidence that led the Legislator Committee to its stated conclusion. If there are privacy concerns at hand, personally identifying information can be redacted without prejudice to the Court’s request.

1 Like
13

Following review of the compiled document by the Legislator Committee, I have sent Justices Kringle and Belschaft the requested information, compliant with the request from the defendant that no personally identifying information was included.

1 Like