RFC: Simplified Welcome Dispatch

[HumanSanity]

@Pronoun

I’ll respond to your concerns in more detail with the next revision of the proposal, but deferring to legislation does not reflect a lack of engagement priorities. It does reflect the fact that one of our priorities is integrating new players in a way that meshes with our existing government and community structure, that you may perhaps hold different priorities (which I’m glad you’re voicing!), and that the most direct way to align these priorities would be through legislation that refines our government and community structure in the way you envision.

I’m not sure where there is legislation that defines the MoE’s “engagement priorities”, nor do I think there needs to be. The only thing I can identify is this from the Charter:

@Sandaoguo

(9) The Minister of Engagement will be responsible for recruiting and integrating new players into the Coalition’s government and community

Which…doesn’t say much. So, essentially our engagement priorities are whatever you want them to be and have never been defined in legislation. The reason I think the Delegate/CG or SPSF choice should be foregrounded is:

1. These are the most concrete actions a nation can take that is designed to bolsters regional power, security, and prestige
2. Each player is permitted one WA nation, if people want to be in the South Pacific then their WA nation should serve the South Pacific in some way, and
3. Frankly, if someone isn’t able to (when prodded to do so) click the buttons to join the WA, endorse the Delegate, and endorse the Coral Guard, then they’re not going to turn out to be some rockstar event planner or roleplayer either. They’re just disengaged.