That’s an important discussion, and I think it needs a balanced approach.
(1) I do believe the executive can have an affirmative legislative agenda, but it should be measured. TSP is not a top-down system, and the Assembly must remain independent. The role of the government should be to propose and support, not dominate. A legislative agenda should exist to provide direction and clarity, not to overwhelm or control the Assembly.
(2) Yes, my government would pursue a legislative agenda, but a focused and realistic one. As Prime Minister, I believe in leading by example, being active, present, and engaged with both Cabinet and the wider region. That includes taking responsibility for bringing forward well-considered proposals, while remaining open to feedback and Assembly-led initiatives.
(3) My priorities would be practical rather than sweeping. I would look at areas where clarity or structure can be improved, particularly around integration, engagement, and how members access and understand the region’s systems. This could include clearer frameworks for onboarding, participation, and communication between ministries and the wider community.
Edit: I seem to have managed to quote then, how exciting!