Nooooooo
Itâs mine and thereâre no arguments about it
Itâs mine btw
Star Council
Remembering Article V
As the Article V says : DUWA CANâT TAKE POST ON THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HILL. END OF PUNISHMENT : 27/03/26. So your purpose to ban Hamborn is an illegal resolution.
Article IV
Even if you ban Hamborn, Youâll canât end the protectorate : ARTICLE IV : THIS LAW IS REPEAL ONLY BY JUSTICE.
Article III
As you are a threat to hill the session of 2026-01-25T12:00:00Z will also talk about your ban.
RESULT OF 1PM SESSION
RESULT ARE FOR 3pm. You will know if you are ban : @CayonNS and @Duwa
If existing laws prove that the protectorate was illegal from the start everything in this set of laws are invalid! Just saying
For incorrect grammar, I have the right to ignore the âlawâ
Article III motion result
Motion Result of @CayonNS
399 for, 188 against (67,97%) as see, CayonNS is banned. End : 25/02/2026 Reason : Illegal referendum.
Motion result of @Duwa
469 for, 118 against (79,9%) as see, Duwa is banned. End : 27/03/26.
Note: The grammar was corrected 1 day ago.
Note2:
Hum, this an attempt to the hillâs souverainty
1 Like
I want to say that you called my vote illegal because I did not hold a proper referendum but instead held a five seconds long vote in my bedroom⌠but your vote should be seen as illegal too, since you never held any referendum or something like that here!
And my special law stands therefore my hill!
My
But you are banned and youâre 5 seconds poll is the detail that validate my treaty GG
But the vote you used to attempt ban should be seen illegal too probably
My
mill
Hill is mine
The vote is rigged
proof that is real : The thing is minimum = 0 for and max for is 587. Just, Article III is a protection against illegal claim and attempt to destruct the souverainty of the Hill. If you stop itâs rigged the Assembly can clear you.
Mine craft
My
Hill