I assumed you wouldn’t like this idea for various reasons. However, I don’t think it matters if they can violate the criminal code even without an office when quite frankly. At least on I can tell on these forums wise there was a handful of cases of people in office and concerns with abusing their power. Where there is none for just a citizen. This has happened recently with Belschaft (who currently is sitting as an Associate justice).
Under the Separation of Powers article in the charter which you mentioned reads this as one of it’s bullets:
I interpret it this way: Since, the Prime Minister, Delegate, and Justices all codified in the constitution they are all offices of the coalition. Meaning while the Associate Justices serve out their time as justices they cannot serve in another office of the coalition which is: Delegate, and Prime Minister. Which means they cannot run for another office and this amendment backs that interpretation up.
Yes, however the recalls or retention votes whichever process comes first doesn’t always work as they be still retained or kept in their position even if they did truly break the criminal code.
as I keep using him as an example
Also want to apologize in advance to Belschaft as I keep using him as a example.