That’s a good question. I would say it would simply be discarded, as there would be no agreement among the leading entities.
But actually, it’s like I’m getting into something I didn’t want to: changing something beyond the aesthetic thing. It never made sense to me to mention Admiralty in the Charter and in the Military Code as a word that refers to two different things.
So, maybe, it’s better to do it:
My main focus is simply to establish exactly what Admiralty means in the Legislation.
Thus, Admiralty would be referred to only in the Military Code, as something being the PM + Board of Admirals. I believe that this would also not change any function that both entities have.